Literature DB >> 12735787

Important drug safety information on the internet: assessing its accuracy and reliability.

Athina Tatsioni1, Evagelia Gerasi, Eumorfili Charitidou, Nafsika Simou, Venetsanos Mavreas, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internet is becoming increasingly important as a source of health-related information, but the accuracy and reliability of information presented on the world wide web is debated.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess whether important, recent drug safety information is accurately reflected on Internet sites.
METHODS: We evaluated whether major warnings issued by the US FDA between October 1, 2000 and September 30, 2001 on severe and life-threatening drug toxicity were mentioned 4-16 months later in the top ten web pages identified for these drugs by each of seven different search engines. We examined predictors of precise mention of the FDA warnings using logistic regressions.
RESULTS: Twenty major safety warnings on 21 drugs (including three withdrawals) were eligible for the study. Among 519 different pertinent web pages retrieved (16-32 for each drug), precise mention of the safety issue was made in only 165 (31.8%). Best rates of precise mention were seen in web sites sponsored by attorneys (79.4%), in physician-oriented web pages (65.5%) and for withdrawn drugs (57.9%). In addition to these factors, better coverage of the FDA warnings was independently seen when no other adverse effects from the same organ system was mentioned (p < 0.001), while coverage was worse when there was no date on the site and web page (p = 0.020), and when the site owner could not be classified or was unknown (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Important safety warnings are inadequately covered in the majority of web pages. This deficiency creates a source of potentially harmful misinformation for health consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12735787     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200326070-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  18 in total

Review 1.  Consumer health informatics.

Authors:  G Eysenbach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

Review 2.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Petra Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

3.  Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics.

Authors:  Heinke Kunst; Diederik Groot; Pallavi M Latthe; Manish Latthe; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

4.  Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Paul D Allen; Steffie J Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein; Sidney M Wolfe; David H Bor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services.

Authors:  M Rigby; J Forsström; R Roberts; J Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

6.  Quality of health information about depression on internet. Level of evidence should be gold standard.

Authors:  S J Darmoni; M C Haugh; B Lukacs; J P Boissel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

7.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Standardized retrieval of side effects data for meta-analysis of safety outcomes. A feasibility study in acute sinusitis.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Priscilla Chew; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Digital Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: A Perfect Storm of Rapid Evolution and Stagnant Regulation Comment on "Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters".

Authors:  Tim K Mackey
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-03

2.  Illicit Internet availability of drugs subject to recall and patient safety consequences.

Authors:  Tim K Mackey; Phyo Aung; Bryan A Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-07-07

3.  Drug safety information through the internet: the experience of an Italian website.

Authors:  Giovanni Polimeni; Alessandra Russo; Maria Antonietta Catania; Andrea Aiello; Alessandro Oteri; Gianluca Trifirò; Gioacchino Calapai; Lidia Sautebin; Massimo Iacobelli; Achille P Caputi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Patient entry of information: evaluation of user interfaces.

Authors:  Matthew I Kim; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.