Literature DB >> 12735374

Revision of ankle arthrodesis.

Yuh-Min Cheng1, Shen-Kai Chen, Jian-Chih Chen, Wen-Lan Wu, Peng-Ju Huang, Hsiu-Chu Chiang, Chen-Yu Lin.   

Abstract

From 1989 to 1996, we treated 18 cases (10 males, eight females; average age 48.2 years) of failed ankle arthrodesis by revision of ankle arthrodesis and followed their progress for at least two years. The average time interval between original surgery and revision was 17.3 months. Revisions were needed due to infection in one case, nonunion in 10 cases, and malalignment in seven cases. The salvage operations included debridement in the infected case, refreshed pseudoarthrosis in nonunion cases, and corrective osteotomy in malalignment cases. Sixteen cases were fixed by crossed screws with internal compression, one infected case was fixed by an external fixator, and one case with bone loss was fixed with buttress plate. The average follow-up period was 40.4 months. There was one nonunion and two delayed unions, with an ultimate fusion rate of 94%. The average AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 70.9 at final follow up. There was one excellent result (5.6%), five good results (27.8%), 11 fair results (61%), and one poor result (5.6%), and the overall results were poorer compared with our series of primary arthrodesis. The time to fusion also took longer in the revision cases (average 2.7 months in primary cases and 4.8 months in revision cases). Fusion techniques that ensure solid union in a functional position are essential. If an ankle arthrodesis fails, however, revision is a salvage procedure that can achieve an acceptable result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12735374     DOI: 10.1177/107110070302400403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Arthrodesis and endoprostheses of the ankle joint: indications, techniques and pitfalls].

Authors:  S H Wirth; G Klammer; N Espinosa
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Hindfoot arthrodesis resulting from retrograde medullary pinning].

Authors:  R Grass; S Rammelt; J Heineck; H Zwipp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Hindfoot Arthrodesis with the Blade Plate: Increased Risk of Complications and Nonunion in a Complex Patient Population.

Authors:  Troy M Gorman; Timothy C Beals; Florian Nickisch; Charles L Saltzman; Mikayla Lyman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Anterior ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Gordon L Slater; Stephanie C Sayres; Martin J O'Malley
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

5.  Revision arthrodesis of the ankle: a 4 cannulated screw compression fixation technique.

Authors:  Sven Tulner; Mark Klinkenbijl; Gerardus Albers
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Revision arthrodesis of the ankle: posterior inlay bone grafting in 11 patients.

Authors:  Fleur V Verhulst; Bart A Swierstra
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Ankle Arthroscopy as an Adjunctive Method for Diagnosis of Nonunion After Tibiotalar Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Eduardo Pedrini Cruz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.