Literature DB >> 12735275

Discrimination of structure: II. Feature binding.

David N George1, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments, pigeons acquired a discrimination between patterns comprising the same features. Thus vertical green bars beside horizontal red bars might have signaled food, and horizontal green bars beside vertical red bars might have signaled no food. The solution of this discrimination can be explained by assuming each pattern is represented either by a template or by structural features that are sensitive to combinations of color and line orientation. The 1st explanation predicts subjects should react to a training pattern rotated 90 degrees in the same way as the pattern on which it is based. The 2nd explanation predicts these patterns should be treated as if they signal opposing outcomes. The experiments confirmed the 2nd of these predictions.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12735275     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  9 in total

1.  Processing of conflicting and redundant stimulus information by pigeons.

Authors:  Kumiko Yokoyama; Deena Dailey; Sheila Chase
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Toward a framework for the evaluation of feature binding in pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Robert G Cook; John F Magnotti
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Do rats use shape to solve "shape discriminations"?

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Lesions of the rat perirhinal cortex spare the acquisition of a complex configural visual discrimination yet impair object recognition.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Mathieu M Albasser; Duncan J Aggleton; Guillaume L Poirier; John M Pearce
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Lesions in the anterior thalamic nuclei of rats do not disrupt acquisition of stimulus sequence learning.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Eman Amin; Trisha A Jenkins; John M Pearce; Jasper Robinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Association rules for rat spatial learning: the importance of the hippocampus for binding item identity with item location.

Authors:  Mathieu M Albasser; Julie R Dumont; Eman Amin; Joshua D Holmes; Murray R Horne; John M Pearce; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Evidence for object-place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Julia E Schroeder
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.926

9.  Selective importance of the rat anterior thalamic nuclei for configural learning involving distal spatial cues.

Authors:  Julie R Dumont; Eman Amin; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.386

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.