Literature DB >> 20708665

Toward a framework for the evaluation of feature binding in pigeons.

Jeffrey S Katz1, Robert G Cook, John F Magnotti.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a new procedure to test for visual binding errors between the dimensions of color and shape. In Experiment 1, pigeons learned to discriminate a target compound from 15 non-target compounds (constructed from four colors and shapes) by choosing one of two hoppers in a two-hopper choice task. The similarity of the target to non-target stimuli influenced choice responding. In Experiment 2, pigeons learned to detect a target compound when presented with a non-target compound within the same trial under conditions of simultaneity and sequentiality. Non-target trials were arranged to allow for the testing of binding errors (i.e., false identifications of the target on certain non-target trials). Transient evidence for binding errors in two of the birds occurred at the start of two-item training, but decreased with training. The experiments represent an important step toward developing a framework for the evaluation of visual feature binding in nonhumans.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708665      PMCID: PMC2975834          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  29 in total

1.  Pattern and process in the evolution of learning.

Authors:  Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes.

Authors:  R G Cook; J S Katz; B R Cavoto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-10

5.  Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration.

Authors:  R G Cook; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-10

6.  Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli.

Authors:  R G Cook; B R Cavoto; J S Katz; K K Cavoto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-10

7.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D Henderson; R Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing.

Authors:  V A Lamme; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  3 in total

1.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  What can fish brains tell us about visual perception?

Authors:  Orsola Rosa Salva; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Evidence for object-place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Julia E Schroeder
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.926

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.