Literature DB >> 12732168

Statistical design in phase II clinical trials and its application in breast cancer.

Francesco Perrone1, Massimo Di Maio, Ermelinda De Maio, Paolo Maione, Alessandro Ottaiano, Matilde Pensabene, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Alessandra Vernaglia Lombardi, Giuseppe Signoriello, Ciro Gallo.   

Abstract

Several statistical designs for phase II studies have been proposed, but they are frequently misunderstood or not applied at all. In this review we describe the major characteristics of the available designs. To investigate the extent to which statistical designs were used in some recent phase II studies, and which designs were the most common, we did a survey of 145 trials involving treatment of breast cancer. Studies selected for the survey were published between 1995 and 1999 in one of seven specific oncology journals (all with impact factor consistently higher than 2). 94 of the studies (64.8%) did not have an identifiable statistical design. However, among the 51 studies with statistical design there was a notable heterogeneity in the type of design applied. We put together a list of factors associated with use of statistical design at univariate analysis. These factors included: referral to a previous phase I study, recent trial start date, private sponsorship, single-agent treatment, and multicentre organisation. Single-agent treatment (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.01-5.51) and multicentre organisation (OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.47-7.15) were independently predictive of the presence of statistical design. Publication in journals with high impact factors and short intervals between the start of the study and publication were also correlated with statistical design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12732168     DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01078-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  5 in total

1.  Harnessing technology to improve clinical trials: study of real-time informatics to collect data, toxicities, image response assessments, and patient-reported outcomes in a phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  M Catherine Pietanza; Ethan M Basch; Alex Lash; Lawrence H Schwartz; Michelle S Ginsberg; Binsheng Zhao; Marwan Shouery; Mary Shaw; Lauren J Rogak; Manda Wilson; Aaron Gabow; Marcia Latif; Kai-Hsiung Lin; Qinfei Wu; Samantha L Kass; Claire P Miller; Leslie Tyson; Dyana K Sumner; Alison Berkowitz-Hergianto; Camelia S Sima; Mark G Kris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Designing phase II trials in cancer: a systematic review and guidance.

Authors:  S R Brown; W M Gregory; C J Twelves; M Buyse; F Collinson; M Parmar; M T Seymour; J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  High-dose intravenous vitamin C combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: a phase I-II clinical trial.

Authors:  L John Hoffer; Line Robitaille; Robert Zakarian; David Melnychuk; Petr Kavan; Jason Agulnik; Victor Cohen; David Small; Wilson H Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Rescue Strategy for Handling Unevaluable Patients in Simon's Two Stage Design.

Authors:  Lisa Belin; Philippe Broët; Yann De Rycke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quality of reporting in oncology phase II trials: A 5-year assessment through systematic review.

Authors:  Julien Langrand-Escure; Romain Rivoirard; Mathieu Oriol; Fabien Tinquaut; Chloé Rancoule; Frank Chauvin; Nicolas Magné; Aurélie Bourmaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.