Literature DB >> 12730735

The Amsterdam Hip Protector Study: compliance and determinants of compliance.

N M van Schoor1, G Asma, J H Smit, L M Bouter, P Lips.   

Abstract

Hip protectors appear to be effective in reducing the incidence of hip fractures. However, compliance is often poor. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the compliance and determinants of compliance with external hip protectors. A prospective study was performed in residents from apartment houses for the elderly, homes for the elderly and nursing homes with a high risk for hip fracture (n=276). The study was performed within the framework of the Amsterdam Hip Protector Study, a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of external hip protectors on the incidence of hip fractures. Compliance was assessed by unannounced visits at 1, 6 and 12 months after inclusion in the study. During the visits, a member of the research team checked whether the participant was wearing the hip protector and, if so, whether it was worn correctly. Furthermore, data on potential determinants of compliance were collected by interviewing the participants or their nurses. Compliance was 60.8% after 1 month (n=217), 44.7% after 6 months (n=246), and 37.0% after 12 months (n=230). Of those wearing the hip protector, 86.7%, 91.7% and 96.5% of the participants were wearing the hip protector correctly after 1, 6 and 12 months respectively; and 14.8%, 16.1% and 8.8% respectively reported wearing the hip protector at night. Compliance after 12 months was predicted by the compliance after 1 month (RR=2.04; 90% CI: 1.05-3.96). Furthermore, people who experienced one or more falls in the half year before baseline had a lower probability of being compliant at 6 months (RR=0.72; 90% CI: 0.52-0.99). In conclusion, compliance is a very important issue in hip protector research and implementation. Although, the compliance percentages were moderately high during the unannounced visits in this study, not everyone was wearing the protector correctly and most participants did not wear the hip protector during the night.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730735     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1382-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  21 in total

1.  Will elderly rest home residents wear hip protectors?

Authors:  M T Villar; P Hill; H Inskip; P Thompson; C Cooper
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures.

Authors:  A Ekman; H Mallmin; K Michaëlsson; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes.

Authors:  A Harada; M Mizuno; M Takemura; H Tokuda; H Okuizumi; N Niino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomized trial of use by individual higher-risk residents.

Authors:  I D Cameron; J Venman; S E Kurrle; K Lockwood; C Birks; R G Cumming; S Quine; G Bashford
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Age and sex patterns of hip fracture--changes in 30 years.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Nilsson; K Obrant; I Sernbo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-06

Review 6.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; H Sievänen; A Heinonen; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Hip protectors improve falls self-efficacy.

Authors:  I D Cameron; B Stafford; R G Cumming; C Birks; S E Kurrle; K Lockwood; S Quine; T Finnegan; G Salkeld
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  M Hubacher; A Wettstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The incidence of hip fracture in Europe.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  What is the true mortality of hip fractures?

Authors:  M J Parker; J K Anand
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.427

View more
  9 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents.

Authors:  Hege Bentzen; Astrid Bergland; Lisa Forsén
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-08-22

4.  Preference for hip protectors among older adults at high risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Barbara Gulanski; Dick R Wittink
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Compliance of external hip protector use amongst elderly day hospital attenders.

Authors:  C W Fan; K M Tan; D Coakley; J B Walsh; C Cunningham
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Could martial arts fall training be safe for persons with osteoporosis?: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Brenda E Groen; Ellen Smulders; Jacques Duysens; Wim van Lankveld; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-04-22

7.  Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in frail institutionalized elderly.

Authors:  Natasja M van Schoor; Martine C de Bruyne; Nicole van der Roer; Els Lommerse; Maurits W van Tulder; Lex M Bouter; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Uptake and adherence with soft- and hard-shelled hip protectors in Norwegian nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  H Bentzen; L Forsén; C Becker; A Bergland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.