Literature DB >> 12730528

A cross-sectional comparison of three self-reported functional indices in scleroderma.

A E Smyth1, A J MacGregor, D Mukerjee, G M Brough, C M Black, C P Denton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In scleroderma, outcome measures such as skin score provide only limited information about the functional impact of the disease. The requirement for validated and convenient instruments that reliably reflect disease morbidity is now recognized. This study compares the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) with two more recently developed scleroderma-specific tools: scleroderma-visual analogue scales (scleroderma-VAS) and the UK scleroderma Functional Score (UKFS). In addition, the use of clinical and laboratory measures as predictors of disease severity have been examined.
METHODS: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients were studied. Subjects completed the 20-item HAQ-DI, the scleroderma-VAS and a questionnaire related to hand and muscle function (UKFS). Clinical details, measurement of maximal hand-spread, fist-closure and investigations for internal organ involvement were recorded.
RESULTS: Over 68% of patients with diffuse disease had moderate to severe disease on the UKFS, compared with 44% with limited disease. The mean UKFS in diffuse disease was 14.7 (s.d. 9.1) and 10.6 (s.d. 8.5) in the limited subset (P=0.02). The mean HAQ-DI in diffuse disease was 1.23 (s.d. 0.77) and 0.79 (s.d. 0.75) in the limited subset (P=0.005). The HAQ-DI showed significant correlation with UKFS (r=0.9; P < 0.001). Several clinical and laboratory measures were associated with higher HAQ-DI and UKFS.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparative study of the UKFS and the HAQ-DI. These data show a strong correlation between assessment methods. Higher scores correlated with clinical and laboratory indicators of severe disease. Used together, these inexpensive tools assess general and organ-specific symptoms, as well as functional limitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730528     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  7 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ).

Authors:  Luiza F Rocha; Roberta G Marangoni; Percival D Sampaio-Barros; Mauricio Levy-Neto; Natalino H Yoshinari; Eloisa Bonfa; Virginia Steen; Sergio C Kowalski
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The use of the hand anatomic index to assess deformity and impaired function in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  A J Roberts-Thomson; N Massy-Westropp; M D Smith; M J Ahern; J Highton; P J Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Clinical significance and usefulness of rehabilitation for systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Naoki Mugii; Yasuhito Hamaguchi; Susanna Maddali-Bongi
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2018-04-04

4.  Oxidative stress in Mexicans with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  M P Cruz-Domínguez; D H Montes-Cortes; I M Olivares-Corichi; O Vera-Lastra; G Medina; L J Jara
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Functional disability and other health-related quality-of-life domains: points to consider for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 6.  Exercise as a multi-modal disease-modifying medicine in systemic sclerosis: An introduction by The Global Fellowship on Rehabilitation and Exercise in Systemic Sclerosis (G-FoRSS).

Authors:  Henrik Pettersson; Helene Alexanderson; Janet L Poole; Janos Varga; Malin Regardt; Anne-Marie Russell; Yasser Salam; Kelly Jensen; Jennifer Mansour; Tracy Frech; Carol Feghali-Bostwick; Cecília Varjú; Nancy Baldwin; Matty Heenan; Kim Fligelstone; Monica Holmner; Matthew R Lammi; Mary Beth Scholand; Lee Shapiro; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Lesley Ann Saketkoo
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.991

7.  Work disability in scleroderma is greater than in rheumatoid arthritis and is predicted by high HAQ scores.

Authors:  Janine M Ouimet; Janet E Pope; Iris Gutmanis; John Koval
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2008-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.