Literature DB >> 12729496

Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing.

Galit Yovel1, Jerre Levy, Marcia Grabowecky, Ken A Paller.   

Abstract

Studies in healthy individuals and split-brain patients have shown that the representation of facial information from the left visual field (LVF) is better than the representation of facial information from the right visual field (RVF). To investigate the neurophysiological basis of this LVF superiority in face perception, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to centrally presented face stimuli in which relevant facial information is present bilaterally (B faces) or only in the left (L faces) or the right (R faces) visual field. Behavioral findings showed best performance for B faces and, in line with the LVF superiority, better performance for L than R faces. Evoked potentials to B, L, and R faces at 100- to 150-msec poststimulus showed no evidence of asymmetric transfer of information between the hemispheres at early stages of visual processing, suggesting that this factor is not responsible for the LVF superiority. Neural correlates of the LVF superiority, however, were manifested in a shorter latency of the face-specific N170 component to L than R faces and in a larger amplitude to L than R faces at 220-280 and 400-600 msec over both hemispheres. These ERP amplitude differences between L and R faces covaried across subjects with the extent to which the face-specific N170 component was larger over the right than the left hemisphere. We conclude that the two hemispheres exchange information symmetrically at early stages of face processing and together generate a shared facial representation, which is better when facial information is directly presented to the right hemisphere (RH; L faces) than to the left hemisphere (LH; R faces) and best when both hemispheres receive facial information (B faces).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729496     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321593162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Split-brain syndrome after hepatic transplantation: a tacrolimus-related vasculitis?

Authors:  Sara Montagnese; Sami Schiff; Carlo Poci; Pamela Iannizzi; Anna Biancardi; Renzo Manara; Chiara Briani; Daniela Mapelli; Giuseppe Realdi; Piero Amodio
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field.

Authors:  Emma Ferneyhough; Damian A Stanley; Elizabeth A Phelps; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

Review 5.  Is human face recognition lateralized to the right hemisphere due to neural competition with left-lateralized visual word recognition? A critical review.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Aliette Lochy
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Faces in the mist: illusory face and letter detection.

Authors:  Cory A Rieth; Kang Lee; Jiangang Lui; Jie Tian; David E Huber
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-08-15

7.  Does face-selective cortex show a left visual field bias for centrally-viewed faces?

Authors:  Matthew T Harrison; Lars Strother
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.054

8.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Valentina Brignone; Silvia Matarazzo; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Effects of affective arousal on choice behavior, reward prediction errors, and feedback-related negativities in human reward-based decision making.

Authors:  Hong-Hsiang Liu; Ming H Hsieh; Yung-Fong Hsu; Wen-Sung Lai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-18

10.  Characteristic visuomotor influences on eye-movement patterns to faces and other high level stimuli.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.