Literature DB >> 12728278

What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression.

Jon F Wilkins1, David Haig.   

Abstract

Parent-specific gene expression (genomic imprinting) is an evolutionary puzzle because it forgoes an important advantage of diploidy--protection against the effects of deleterious recessive mutations. Three hypotheses claim to have found a countervailing selective advantage of parent-specific expression. Imprinting is proposed to have evolved because it enhances evolvability in a changing environment, protects females against the ravages of invasive trophoblast, or because natural selection acts differently on genes of maternal and paternal origin in interactions among kin. The last hypothesis has received the most extensive theoretical development and seems the best supported by the properties of known imprinted genes. However, the hypothesis is yet to provide a compelling explanation for many examples of imprinting.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728278     DOI: 10.1038/nrg1062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  143 in total

Review 1.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic imprinting as a cause of disease.

Authors:  Jill Clayton-Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

4.  Progress and Promise in using Arabidopsis to Study Adaptation, Divergence, and Speciation.

Authors:  Ben Hunter; Kirsten Bomblies
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2010-09-29

Review 5.  A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development.

Authors:  Brian P Dilkes; Luca Comai
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Ocular refraction: heritability and genome-wide search for eye morphometry traits in an isolated Sardinian population.

Authors:  Ginevra Biino; Maria Antonietta Palmas; Carla Corona; Dionigio Prodi; Manuela Fanciulli; Roberta Sulis; Antonina Serra; Maurizio Fossarello; Mario Pirastu
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Polyandry, life-history trade-offs and the evolution of imprinting at Mendelian loci.

Authors:  Walter Mills; Tom Moore
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Allelic expression of IGF2 in live-bearing, matrotrophic fishes.

Authors:  Betty R Lawton; Leila Sevigny; Craig Obergfell; David Reznick; Rachel J O'Neill; Michael J O'Neill
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 0.900

9.  A parent-of-origin effect on honeybee worker ovary size.

Authors:  Benjamin P Oldroyd; Michael H Allsopp; Katherine M Roth; Emily J Remnant; Robert A Drewell; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Maternal transmission effects of the PAX genes among cleft case-parent trios from four populations.

Authors:  Jae Woong Sull; Kung-Yee Liang; Jacqueline B Hetmanski; Margaret Daniele Fallin; Roxanne G Ingersoll; Jiwan Park; Yah-Huei Wu-Chou; Philip K Chen; Samuel S Chong; Felicia Cheah; Vincent Yeow; Beyoung Yun Park; Sun Ha Jee; Ethylin W Jabs; Richard Redett; Alan F Scott; Terri H Beaty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.