Literature DB >> 12725732

Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: evidence from motor flash-lag.

Romi Nijhawan1, Kuno Kirschfeld.   

Abstract

Motor behaviors require animals to coordinate neural activity across different areas within their motor system. In particular, the significant processing delays within the motor system must somehow be compensated for. Internal models of the motor system, in particular the forward model, have emerged as important potential mechanisms for compensation. For motor responses directed at moving visual objects, there is, additionally, a problem of delays within the sensory pathways carrying crucial position information. The visual phenomenon known as the flash-lag effect has led to a motion-extrapolation model for compensation of sensory delays. In the flash-lag effect, observers see a flashed item colocalized with a moving item as lagging behind the moving item. Here, we explore the possibility that the internal forward model and the motion-extrapolation model are analogous mechanisms compensating for neural delays in the motor and the visual system, respectively. In total darkness, observers moved their right hand gripping a rod while a visual flash was presented at various positions in relation to the rod. When the flash was aligned with the rod, observers perceived it in a position lagging behind the instantaneous felt position of the invisible rod. These results suggest that compensation of neural delays for time-varying motor behavior parallels compensation of delays for time-varying visual stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12725732     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00248-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Masashi Nakatani; Hideyuki Ando; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile motion lacks momentum.

Authors:  Gianluca Macauda; Bigna Lenggenhager; Rebekka Meier; Gregory Essick; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  The buzz-lag effect.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lisa Scocchia; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Timing of anticipatory muscle tensing control: responses before and after expected impact.

Authors:  Peter M Vishton; Kristin M Reardon; Jennifer A Stevens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Free will debates: Simple experiments are not so simple.

Authors:  W R Klemm
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08-30

8.  Characteristics of motor resonance predict the pattern of flash-lag effects for biological motion.

Authors:  Klaus Kessler; Lucy Gordon; Kari Cessford; Martin Lages
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Macaque monkeys perceive the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.