Literature DB >> 12723785

A simple and sensitive method to measure timing accuracy.

Armand De Clercq1, Geert Crombez, Ann Buysse, Herbert Roeyers.   

Abstract

Timing accuracy in presenting experimental stimuli (visual information on a PC or on a TV) and responding (keyboard presses and mouse signals) is of importance in several experimental paradigms. In this article, a simple system for measuring timing accuracy is described. The system uses two PCs (at least Pentium II, 200 MHz), a photocell, and an amplifier. No additional boards and timing hardware are needed. The first PC, a SlavePC, monitors the keyboard presses or mouse signals from the PC under test and uses a photocell that is placed in front of the screen to detect the appearance of visual stimuli on the display. The software consists of a small program running on the SlavePC. The SlavePC is connected through a serial line with a second PC. This MasterPC controls the SlavePC through an ActiveX control, which is used in a Visual Basic program. The accuracy of our system was investigated by using a similar setup of a SlavePC and a MasterPC to generate pulses and by using a pulse generator card. These tests revealed that our system has a 0.01-msec accuracy. As an illustration, the reaction time accuracy of INQUISIT for a few applications was tested using our system. It was found that in those applications that we investigated, INQUISIT measures reaction times from keyboard presses with millisecond accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12723785     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  6 in total

1.  Language Is a Unique Context for Emotion Perception.

Authors:  Cameron M Doyle; Maria Gendron; Kristen A Lindquist
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2021-01-13

2.  A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High-Quality Data: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Victoria Leong; Kausar Raheel; Jia Yi Sim; Kriti Kacker; Vasilis M Karlaftis; Chrysoula Vassiliu; Kastoori Kalaivanan; S H Annabel Chen; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Priming healthy eating. You can't prime all the people all of the time.

Authors:  Suzanna E Forwood; Amy L Ahern; Gareth J Hollands; Yin-Lam Ng; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Inhibition of retrieval in hypnotic amnesia: dissociation by upper-alpha gating.

Authors:  Graham A Jamieson; Marios D Kittenis; Ruxandra I Tivadar; Ian D Evans
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-04-19

6.  The disruptive effects of pain on n-back task performance in a large general population sample.

Authors:  Nina Attridge; Donna Noonan; Christopher Eccleston; Edmund Keogh
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.