PURPOSE: To evaluate potential use of a loopless internal receiver coil for in vivo coronary artery vessel wall imaging in five domestic swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intravascular free-breathing black blood coronary vessel wall imaging was performed using a previously described double inversion fast spin echo technique after x-ray guided placement of an internal receiver coil in or in close proximity to the target vessel (LAD, LCX). RESULTS: Image quality using the phased array coil was reproducible, while image quality with the internal receiver coil was heavily dependent on coil position with respect to the examined artery, and likely also dependent on blood flow and/or cardiac-related coil motion. With internal coil placement in the left circumflex coronary artery, images of the left anterior descending vessel wall appeared similar or superior compared to commercially available phased array surface coil images. With coil placement in the target vessel itself, imaging was suboptimal because of the extremely high signal intensity (hotspot) in close proximity to the vessel wall, leading to low contrast between the vessel wall and the surrounding tissues and blood. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo intravascular coronary vessel wall imaging. Continued research is necessary to minimize coil motion and optimize coil sensitivity algorithms. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate potential use of a loopless internal receiver coil for in vivo coronary artery vessel wall imaging in five domestic swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intravascular free-breathing black blood coronary vessel wall imaging was performed using a previously described double inversion fast spin echo technique after x-ray guided placement of an internal receiver coil in or in close proximity to the target vessel (LAD, LCX). RESULTS: Image quality using the phased array coil was reproducible, while image quality with the internal receiver coil was heavily dependent on coil position with respect to the examined artery, and likely also dependent on blood flow and/or cardiac-related coil motion. With internal coil placement in the left circumflex coronary artery, images of the left anterior descending vessel wall appeared similar or superior compared to commercially available phased array surface coil images. With coil placement in the target vessel itself, imaging was suboptimal because of the extremely high signal intensity (hotspot) in close proximity to the vessel wall, leading to low contrast between the vessel wall and the surrounding tissues and blood. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo intravascular coronary vessel wall imaging. Continued research is necessary to minimize coil motion and optimize coil sensitivity algorithms. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Alexander J Dick; Venkatesh K Raman; Amish N Raval; Michael A Guttman; Richard B Thompson; Cengizhan Ozturk; Dana C Peters; Annette M Stine; Victor J Wright; William H Schenke; Robert J Lederman Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: S C Gerretsen; M E Kooi; S Schalla; T Delhaas; G Snoep; J M A Van Engelshoven; T Leiner Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.167