Literature DB >> 12720075

Development and validation of a patient-specific predictive instrument for the need for dose reduction in chemotherapy for breast cancer: a potential decision aid for the use of myeloid growth factors.

Panos Savvides1, Norma Terrin, John Erban, Harry P Selker.   

Abstract

A predictive instrument for chemotherapy dose reductions would help optimize delivery of planned chemotherapy and rationalize the use of myeloid growth factors. We analyzed data on 833 women with breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, for six cycles in two phase III clinical trials. From the first study ( n=323), we generated a logistic regression model that predicts an individual patient's probability of receiving significantly reduced chemotherapy, defined as less than 85% of the planned dose over cycles 2-6, using data generated from cycle 1. The model was validated on data from the second study ( n=510). The predictive model's variables include nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in cycle 1 (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.30, P<0.001) and percent drop of platelets between day 1 and the nadir in cycle 1 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05, P<0.001). Both variables are dose adjusted based on the chemotherapy cycle 1 dose. The model's discriminatory performance was good (ROC area=0.82), as was the calibration of predicted with actual frequencies of dose reductions. In the validation dataset, model variables remained significant, with an ROC area of 0.78 and good calibration. In summary, we devised and validated a predictive instrument that uses data from a patient's first cycle of chemotherapy to compute the probability of requiring a significant chemotherapy dose reduction on subsequent cycles. This instrument could help clinicians select patients who will benefit from early administration of myeloid growth factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12720075     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-003-0442-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant breast cancer therapy: current status and future strategies--growth kinetics and the improved drug therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  L Norton
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Patient-specific predictions of outcomes in myocardial infarction for real-time emergency use: a thrombolytic predictive instrument.

Authors:  H P Selker; J L Griffith; J R Beshansky; C H Schmid; R M Califf; R B D'Agostino; M M Laks; K L Lee; C Maynard; R H Selvester; G S Wagner; W D Weaver
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Thrombopoietin.

Authors:  K Kaushansky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Systems for comparing actual and predicted mortality rates: characteristics to promote cooperation in improving hospital care.

Authors:  H P Selker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology. Recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  M W Pozen; R B D'Agostino; H P Selker; P A Sytkowski; W B Hood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  W C Wood; D R Budman; A H Korzun; M R Cooper; J Younger; R D Hart; A Moore; J A Ellerton; L Norton; C R Ferree
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: understanding the overview. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

1.  Random treatment assignment using mathematical equipoise for comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Robin Ruthazer; Norma Terrin; John L Griffith; Thomas Concannon; David M Kent
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Preoperative Nutritional Status Contributes to the Development of Neutropenia Event in Patients With Gastric Cancer Receiving CAPEOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ai Tang Xiao; Yi Xin Tong; Xiang Shang Xu; Yi Zhou; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Hans-Georg Eichler; Norman L Stockbridge; Newell E McElwee; Willard H Dere; Theodora Cohen; John K Erban; Vicki L Seyfert-Margolis; Peter K Honig; Kenneth I Kaitin; Kenneth A Oye; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Risk assessment model for first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  A López-Pousa; J Rifà; A Casas de Tejerina; J L González-Larriba; C Iglesias; J A Gasquet; A Carrato
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  First-cycle absolute neutrophil count can be used to improve chemotherapy-dose delivery and reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving adjuvant therapy: a validation study.

Authors:  Edgardo Rivera; M Haim Erder; Moshe Fridman; Debra Frye; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  A proposal for integrated efficacy-to-effectiveness (E2E) clinical trials.

Authors:  H P Selker; K A Oye; H-G Eichler; N L Stockbridge; C R Mehta; K I Kaitin; N E McElwee; P K Honig; J K Erban; R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 6.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.