Literature DB >> 12719203

A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with atrial fibrillation and a low risk for stroke while taking aspirin.

Carl van Walraven1, Robert G Hart, George A Wells, Palle Petersen, Peter J Koudstaal, Annette L Gullov, Beppie S P Hellemons, Birgitte G Koefed, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to derive and internally validate a simple and easily applied clinical prediction rule to identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) whose stroke risk while taking aspirin is, irrespective of age, low enough that oral anticoagulation therapy is unnecessary.
METHODS: We included 2501 patients with AF treated with aspirin during participation in 6 clinical trials. Patients were randomly divided into derivation and validation sets. Recursive partitioning was used to identify patients in the derivation set whose risk for stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or transient ischemic attack was comparable to that observed in an age- and sex-matched cohort from the Framingham Heart Study. The derived prediction rules were tested on the validation set.
RESULTS: Overall, 166 patients (6.6%) had an event during 4688.6 person-years (PYs) of observation for an incident rate of 3.5 events per 100 PYs. Patients in the derivation set classified as low risk (no previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, no treated hypertension or systolic blood pressure equal to or exceeding 140 mm Hg, no symptomatic coronary artery disease, and no diabetes) experienced 1.0 events per 100 PYs, compared with an age- and sex-matched rate of 1.2 events per 100 PYs. In the validation set, low-risk patients experienced 1.1 events per 100 PYs (expected rate of 1.2 events per 100 PYs). Low-risk patients made up 24% of the cohort and 16% of patients older than 75 years. Low-risk patients who were randomized to therapeutic oral anticoagulation therapy experienced 1.5 events per 100 PYs.
CONCLUSION: Irrespective of age, patients with AF and none of these 4 clinical features and who take aspirin have stroke rates comparable to those of age-matched community cohorts and would not benefit substantially from anticoagulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719203     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cardiology.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Knut Schroeder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Promise of factor Xa inhibition in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Manesh R Patel; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  First in vivo use of a capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer array-based imaging and ablation catheter.

Authors:  Douglas N Stephens; Uyen T Truong; Amin Nikoozadeh; Omer Oralkan; Chi Hyung Seo; Jonathan Cannata; Aaron Dentinger; Kai Thomenius; Alan de la Rama; Tho Nguyen; Feng Lin; Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Matt O'Donnell; David J Sahn
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: warfarin faces its challengers.

Authors:  Joseph L Blackshear; Fred Kusumoto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  John J You; Daniel E Singer; Patricia A Howard; Deirdre A Lane; Mark H Eckman; Margaret C Fang; Elaine M Hylek; Sam Schulman; Alan S Go; Michael Hughes; Frederick A Spencer; Warren J Manning; Jonathan L Halperin; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Left atrial appendage exclusion for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: review of minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Joshua D Moss
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Differences in guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  I C van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Cardioembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation-rationale for preventive closure of the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Boris Leithäuser; Jai-Wun Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Stroke risk associated with balloon based catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Rationale and design of the MACPAF Study.

Authors:  Karl Georg Haeusler; Lydia Koch; Juliane Ueberreiter; Matthias Endres; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Peter U Heuschmann; Alexander Schirdewan; Jochen B Fiebach
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  The risk stratification in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Domenico Prisco; Caterina Cenci; Elena Silvestri; Giacomo Emmi; Tommaso Barnini; Carlo Tamburini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.