Literature DB >> 12719064

Proposed pathogenesis for the delayed postoperative opacification of the hydroview hydrogel intraocular lens.

Michael W Dorey1, Seymour Brownstein, Vivian E Hill, Benjamin Mathew, Gianluigi Botton, Peter J Kertes, Sherif El-Defrawy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the clinical, histopathologic, ultrastructural, and elemental features of 17 opacified Hydroview (Bausch and Lomb Surgical, Rochester, New York, USA) hydrogel intraocular lenses (IOL) necessitating explantation and discuss from a clinicopathologic perspective why these lenses became opacified. Interventional case series with clinicopathologic correlation.
METHODS: Seventeen hydrogel lenses were explanted from 17 different patients owing to decreased visual acuity or quality of vision an average of 29 months after uneventful phacoemulsification and IOL implantation and associated with a granular-appearing opacification superficially within the optic. Lenses were examined by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersion x-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. A control IOL was included in our study.
RESULTS: All explanted lenses showed positive staining for calcium by light microscopy. Transmission electron microscopy disclosed electron-dense crystalline deposits in the superficial substance of the IOL optic. Energy dispersion x-ray spectra analyses showed the presence of calcium and phosphorus mainly in the electron-dense periphery of the deposits in all of the specimens and the presence of silicon mainly in the electron-lucent center of the deposits in the majority of the specimens. No positive staining or deposits were observed on the IOL control or in the haptics.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to demonstrate that the calcium deposits are associated with silicon, which was presumably derived from the silicone gasket in the Surefold (Bausch and Lomb Surgical, Rochester, New York, USA) packaging system, manufactured specifically for this IOL. Silicon may act as a nidus for calcium deposition within the lens, which is consistent with our findings. There may be other factors involved, and this important clinical problem requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719064     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02154-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  11 in total

1.  Investigation and management of an epidemic of Hydroview intraocular lens opacification.

Authors:  R W Altaie; T Costigan; S Donegan; P O'brien; U Mahmood; A J Bogdan; S Beatty
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Surgical and visual outcomes following exchange of opacified Hydroview intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Rasha Altaie; Edward Loane; Kathleen O'Sullivan; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Ultrastructural evaluation of explanted opacified Hydroview (H60M) intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Knox Cartwright; Eric J Mayer; Brendan M McDonald; Andrew Skinner; Chris J Salter; Derek M Tole; John M Sparrow; Andrew D Dick; David J P Ferguson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Analysis of aqueous humor calcium and phosphate from cataract eyes with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Chan Joong Kim; Sang Kyung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06

5.  Intraocular lens exchange through a 3.2-mm corneal incision for opacified intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Anil Kubaloglu; Esin Sogutlu Sari; Arif Koytak; Yasin Cinar; Kazim Erol; Yusuf Ozerturk
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Biomaterial Influence on Intraocular Lens Performance: An Overview.

Authors:  Cari Pérez-Vives
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 7.  An overview of the influence and design of biomaterial of the intraocular implant of the posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  Razvan Vladimir Nanu; Emil Ungureanu; Sinziana Luminita Instrate; Alexandra Vrapciu; Roxana Cozubas; Laura Carstocea; Liliana Mary Voinea; Radu Ciuluvica
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

8.  Hydrophilic Acrylic versus PMMA Intraocular Lens Implantation in Pediatric Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Mahmoud-Reza Panahi-Bazaz; Mitra Zamani; Bijan Abazar
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2009-10

9.  Effect of hydrophobic acrylic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jiaxing Wang; Zhuo Chen; Xin Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intraocular Lens Calcification: Clinico-pathological Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mansour Rahimi; Ali Azimi; Masoud Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.