Literature DB >> 12716982

Patterns of transitional mutation biases within and among mammalian genomes.

Michael S Rosenberg1, Sankar Subramanian, Sudhir Kumar.   

Abstract

Significant transition/transversion mutation bias is a well-appreciated aspect of mammalian nuclear genomes; however, patterns of bias among genes within a genome and among species remain largely uncharacterized. Understanding these patterns is important for understanding similarities and differences in mutational patterns among genomes and genomic regions. Therefore, we have conducted an analysis of 7,587 pairs of sequences of 4,347 mammalian protein-coding genes from seven species (human, mouse, rat, cow, sheep, pig, and macaque) and from the introns of 51 gene pairs and multiple intergenic regions (37 kbp, 52 kbp and 65 kbp) from the human, chimpanzee, and baboon genomes. Our analyses show that genes and regions with widely varying base composition exhibit uniformity of transition mutation rate both within and among mammalian lineages, as long as the transitional mutations caused by CpG hypermutability are excluded. The estimates show no relationship to potential intrachromosomal or interchromosomal effects. This uniformity points to similarity in point mutation processes in genomic regions with substantially different GC-content biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12716982     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  43 in total

1.  Testing the chromosomal speciation hypothesis for humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Xiaoxia Wang; Ondrej Podlaha
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Reliabilities of identifying positive selection by the branch-site and the site-prediction methods.

Authors:  Masafumi Nozawa; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Methods for incorporating the hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides in detecting natural selection operating at the amino acid sequence level.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Takashi Gojobori; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  High resolution melting analysis of almond SNPs derived from ESTs.

Authors:  Shu-Biao Wu; Michelle G Wirthensohn; Peter Hunt; John P Gibson; Margaret Sedgley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Synonymous codon usage, GC(3), and evolutionary patterns across plastomes of three pooid model species: emerging grass genome models for monocots.

Authors:  Gaurav Sablok; Kinshuk Chandra Nayak; Franck Vazquez; Tatiana V Tatarinova
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Low exchangeability of selenocysteine, the 21st amino acid, in vertebrate proteins.

Authors:  Sergi Castellano; Aida M Andrés; Elena Bosch; Mònica Bayes; Roderic Guigó; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Selection pressure on human STR loci and its relevance in repeat expansion disease.

Authors:  Makoto K Shimada; Ryoko Sanbonmatsu; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Chisato Yamasaki; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Ranajit Chakraborty; Takashi Gojobori; Tadashi Imanishi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  More genes underwent positive selection in chimpanzee evolution than in human evolution.

Authors:  Margaret A Bakewell; Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Identification of a group of Mus dunni endogenous virus-like endogenous retroviruses from the C57BL/6J mouse genome: proviral genomes, strain distribution, expression characteristics, and genomic integration profile.

Authors:  Kang-Hoon Lee; Ri-Na You; David G Greenhalgh; Kiho Cho
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.