Literature DB >> 12714953

Assessment of therapy response by FDG PET in pediatric patients.

C Franzius1, O Schober.   

Abstract

Little is known about the clinical value of FDG PET for assessing treatment response in pediatric oncology. After systematic review of literature, the very few publications concerning response control in pediatric oncology using FDG PET are summarized. There were only 4 studies concerning FDG PET in the assessment of therapy response in pediatric patients. None of the publications fulfilled the requirements for high quality studies because of the small number of patients studied. The clinical value of FDG PET in the assessment of therapy response in pediatric oncology is likely in osseous sarcomas and possibly in high-grade brain tumors. In other pediatric tumor entities such as lymphomas, soft-tissue sarcomas, germ cell tumors, or neuroblastomas, the clinical usefulness of FDG PET can either be assumed analogous to adults, or can be assumed from staging studies, or is still unknown. There is a need for large, systematic studies evaluating FDG PET in therapy monitoring, but also in grading, staging, and in the diagnosis of recurrences in pediatric malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12714953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med        ISSN: 1125-0135


  6 in total

1.  Brown adipose tissue 18F-FDG uptake in pediatric PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Terence S Hong; Amer Shammas; Martin Charron; Katherine A Zukotynski; Laura A Drubach; Ruth Lim
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-12-16

2.  Evaluation of treatment-associated inflammatory response on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Kuei C Lee; Charles R Meyer; Marcian E Van Dort; Kyle K Kuszpit; Robert A Koeppe; Rajesh Ranga; Bradford A Moffat; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Guidelines for 18F-FDG PET and PET-CT imaging in paediatric oncology.

Authors:  J Stauss; C Franzius; T Pfluger; K U Juergens; L Biassoni; J Begent; R Kluge; H Amthauer; T Voelker; L Højgaard; S Barrington; S Hain; T Lynch; K Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  (18)F-FDG PET in sarcoma treatment response imaging.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Douglas S Hawkins; Eve T Rodler; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-23

5.  The impact of PET scanning on management of paediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  E A Wegner; S F Barrington; J E Kingston; R O Robinson; R E Ferner; M Taj; M A Smith; M J O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-31       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Incorporating PET information in radiation therapy planning.

Authors:  M Macmanus; T Leong
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.