Literature DB >> 12714231

Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents.

J Hohmann1, T Albrecht, C W Hoffmann, K-J Wolf.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US) is the first choice for screening patients with suspected liver lesions. However, due to a lack of contrast agents, US used to be less sensitive and specific compared with computed tomography (CT) and magnet resonance imaging (MRI). The advent of microbubble contrast agents increased both sensitivity and specificity dramatically. Rapid developments of the contrast agents as well as of special imaging techniques were made in recent years. Today numerous different US imaging methods exist which based either on Doppler or on harmonic imaging. They are using the particular behaviour of microbubbles in a sound field which varies depending on the energy of insonation (low/high mechanical index, MI) as well as on the properties of the agent themselves. Apart from just blood pool enhancement some agents have a hepatosplenic specific late phase. US imaging during this late phase using relatively high MI in phase inversion mode (harmonic imaging) or stimulated acoustic emission (SAE; Doppler method) markedly improves the detection of focal liver lesions and is also very helpful for lesion characterisation. With regards to detection, contrast enhanced US performs similarly to CT as shown by recent studies. Early results of studies using low MI imaging and the newer perfluor agents are also showing promising results for lesion detection. Low MI imaging with these agents has the advantage of real time imaging and is particularly helpful for characterisation of focal lesions based on their dynamic contrast behaviour. Apart from the techniques which based on the morphology of liver lesions there were some attempts for the detection of occult metastases or micrometastases by means of liver blood flow changes. Also in this field the use of US contrast agents appears to have advantages over formerly used non contrast-enhanced methods although no conclusive results are available yet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12714231     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00053-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  25 in total

1.  Value of post-vascular phase (Kupffer imaging) by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Eriko Goto; Ryota Masuzaki; Ryosuke Tateishi; Yuji Kondo; Jun Imamura; Tadashi Goto; Hitoshi Ikeda; Masaaki Akahane; Shuichiro Shiina; Masao Omata; Haruhiko Yoshida; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: The evolving applications.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

3.  Detection of focal liver lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Hui-Xiong Xu; Xiao-Yan Xie
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

4.  Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; S Crosara; R De Robertis; S Canestrini; V Cantisani; G Morana; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 5.  Approaches to the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Morris Sherman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-02

6.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents in the Study of Kidney Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Kambiz Kalantarinia; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2007

Review 7.  [Radiological diagnosis of primary hepatic malignancy].

Authors:  Benjamin Henninger; Johannes Petersen; Werner Jaschke
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-02-08

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Yonghua Niu; Tairi Huang; Feng Lian; Fenghua Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-06-27

9.  Antitumor effects of combining tumor radiation with the antivascular action of ultrasound stimulated microbubbles.

Authors:  Yanlei Ji; Zhen Han; Limei Shao; Yuehuan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and characterization of liver tumors.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Jang; Hojun Yu; Tae Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.