Literature DB >> 12713245

Ignoring famous faces: category-specific dilution of distractor interference.

Rob Jenkins1, Nilli Lavie, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

The extent to which famous distractor faces can be ignored was assessed in six experiments. Subjects categorized famous printed target names as those of pop stars or politicians, while attempting to ignore a flanking famous face distractor that could be congruent (e.g, a politician's name and face) or incongruent (e.g., a politician's name with a pop stars face). Congruency effects on reaction times indicated distractor intrusion. An additional, response-neutral flanker (neither pop star nor politician) could also be present. Congruency effects from the critical distractor face were reduced (diluted) by the presence of an intact anonymous face, but not by phase-shifted versions, inverted faces, or meaningful nonface objects. By contrast, congruency effects from other types of distracting objects (musical instruments, fruits), when printed names for these classes were categorized, were diluted equivalently by intact faces, phase-shifted faces, or meaningful nonface objects. Our results suggest that distractor faces act differently from other types of distractors, suffering from only face-specific capacity limits.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12713245     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Katherine Sledge Moore; David B Drowos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

2.  Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.

Authors:  Shiori Sato; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

3.  Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Michael L Mack; Isabel Gauthier; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Working memory load for faces modulates P300, N170, and N250r.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Christoph Klein; Stephan G Boehm; Kimron L Shapiro; David E J Linden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Ignored faces produce figural face aftereffects.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Madeline Judge; Yan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Ana Torralbo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Famous faces demand attention due to reduced inhibitory processing.

Authors:  Liana Machado; Hayley Guiney; Andrew Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sensory competition in the face processing areas of the human brain.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Involuntary facial expression processing: extracting information from two simultaneously presented faces.

Authors:  Samantha Baggott; Romina Palermo; Mark A Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Weight and see: loading working memory improves incidental identification of irrelevant faces.

Authors:  David Carmel; Jake Fairnie; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.