| Literature DB >> 12711707 |
M-L Mille1, M W Rogers, K Martinez, L D Hedman, M E Johnson, S R Lord, R C Fitzpatrick.
Abstract
Standing subjects were unexpectedly pulled forward to identify a threshold boundary that evokes stepping in terms of the size of the pull relative to the base of support (BoS). Performances in a range of sensorimotor tests were correlated with the threshold boundary parameters. Younger and older subjects were studied to identify age-related changes in stepping and the threshold boundaries. The threshold boundary had a forward limit (T(L)) that, when crossed, always made subjects step no matter how slowly they were pulled. As velocity increased, the threshold position that produced a step shifted nearer to the ankles. Eventually a pull velocity was reached above which velocity had no further effect and a position threshold (T(H)) was identified behind which subjects never stepped. Thus the position threshold boundary for stepping is a posterior-going sigmoidal function of perturbation velocity. Older subjects stepped more than the young (69% vs. 40% of trials). For the older subjects, T(L) (91% vs. 107% BoS) and T(H) (59% vs. 72% BoS) were closer to the ankles, and the transition between T(L) and T(H) occurred at lower velocities (96% vs. 121% BoS.s(-1)). Across the entire study population many sensorimotor factors were associated with T(L) and T(H). However, these associations were not present when age was removed as a factor. Thus, although the older subjects use protective stepping more often, this cannot be attributed directly to the sensorimotor factors tested here. It can be explained by stepping as a triggered response to the perturbation event rather than later sensory input about body movement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12711707 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00974.2002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurophysiol ISSN: 0022-3077 Impact factor: 2.714