Literature DB >> 12710750

Can toothpaste or a toothbrush with antibacterial tufts prevent toothbrush contamination?

Marc Quirynen1, Marc De Soete, Martine Pauwels, Sotiria Gizani, Bart Van Meerbeek, Daniel van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periopathogens and cariogenic species survive more than 48 hours on toothbrushes even under dry storage. This study examined a decontamination of toothbrushes by means of the bactericidal effect of different toothpastes or a special coating of the tufts.
METHODS: Eight untreated periodontitis patients were professionally brushed, using a new toothbrush per quadrant and 3 different toothpastes containing either amine/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF2), amine fluoride (AmF), or a mild surfactant as major antibacterial component (excipient), or no paste (C). The brushes were rinsed and stored dry at room temperature. At different time intervals, 4 tufts per toothbrush were processed for selective and non-selective culturing procedures. The protocol was repeated comparing AmF/SnF2 and C with 2 toothbrushes with coated tufts (coat1 and coat2).
RESULTS: At baseline, C brushes (n = 16) harbored 10(7), 10(8), and 10(6) colony forming units (CFU) of aerobic, anaerobic, and black pigmented species, respectively. After 24 hours 10(6) CFU of aerobic and anaerobic species could still be cultured from 14 of the 16 brushes. Black-pigmented species remained detectable up to 4 hours; detection frequencies for Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus mutans at 24 hours were 5/16. With AmF/SnF2 and AmF toothpaste the number of adhering bacteria was already 2 log lower at baseline (P<0.05), but not for the excipient (0.5 log, P = 0.7). With AmF/SnF2 no vital species could be detected after 8 hours. AmF reduced the bacterial survival rate significantly more than the excipient, but less than AmF/SnF2 (P<0.05). The bactericidal effect of coat1 and coat2 was negligible when compared to C (P>0.20), and clearly inferior to the AmF/SnF2 paste (P<0.0001). After 24 hours these brushes still harbored >10(5) CFU.
CONCLUSIONS: Toothpastes can significantly reduce contamination of toothbrushes, but their bactericidal activity is dependent on their composition. Coated tufts failed to limit the bacterial contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12710750     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  10 in total

1.  Antimicrobial capacity of Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice against Streptococcus mutans strains in toothbrushes: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Patrícia Fernanda Roesler Bertolini; Oswaldo Biondi Filho; Arnaldo Pomilio; Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro; Meghi Silva de Carvalho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Transmission of Monospecies and Dual-Species Biofilms from Smooth to Nanopillared Surfaces.

Authors:  Ferdi Hizal; Chang-Hwan Choi; Jelmer Sjollema; Titik Nuryastuti; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Rene T Rozenbaum; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Stefan W Wessel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Children's toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem?

Authors:  Paulo Nelson-Filho; Maristela Soares Swerts Pereira; Andiara De Rossi; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Késsia Suênia Fidelis de Mesquita; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  An in vitro antimicrobial activity of ten Iranian-made toothpastes.

Authors:  Mostafa Sadeghi; Shokrollah Assar
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2009

5.  Toothbrush contamination: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle R Frazelle; Cindy L Munro
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-01-24

6.  Influence of time, toothpaste and saliva in the retention of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis on different toothbrushes.

Authors:  Julia Caroline Schmidt; Miriam Bux; Elisabeth Filipuzzi-Jenny; Eva Maria Kulik; Tuomas Waltimo; Roland Weiger; Clemens Walter
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Quantification and qualification of bacteria trapped in chewed gum.

Authors:  Stefan W Wessel; Henny C van der Mei; David Morando; Anje M Slomp; Betsy van de Belt-Gritter; Amarnath Maitra; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of garlic, tea tree oil, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, and ultraviolet sanitizing device in the decontamination of toothbrush.

Authors:  Dithi Chandrdas; H L Jayakumar; Mahesh Chandra; Lavleen Katodia; Athira Sreedevi
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2014-10

9.  Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting Streptococcus mutans growth on toothbrush bristles.

Authors:  Dalia Mamdouh Talaat; Aly Abd El-Aziz Sharaf; Mona Abd El-Moneim Ghoneim; Soraya Ali El-Shazly; Omar Abd El Sadek El Meligy
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2018-08-04

10.  Efficacy of Experimental Mouth Rinses on Caries-Related Biofilms in vitro.

Authors:  Josiana Steiger; Olivier Braissant; Tuomas Waltimo; Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.