Literature DB >> 12710563

Bioethical theory and practice in genetic screening for type 1 diabetes.

U Gustafsson Stolt1, J Ludvigsson, P E Liss, T Svensson.   

Abstract

Due to the potential ethical and psychological implications of screening, and especially in regard of screening on children without available and acceptable therapeutic measures, there is a common view that such procedures are not advisable. As part of an independent research- and bioethical case study, our aim was therefore to explore and describe bioethical issues among a representative sample of participant families (n = 17,055 children) in the ABIS (All Babies In South-east Sweden) research screening for Type 1 diabetes (IDDM). The primary aim is the identification of risk factors important for the development of diabetes and other multifactorial immune-mediated diseases. Four hundred, randomly chosen, participant mothers were asked to complete a questionnaire exploring issues of information, informed consent, bio-material, confidentiality and autonomy, and of prevention/intervention. 293 completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 73.3%. The majority of questions had the form of 6-point Likert-type response scales (1-6). We found that the majority of respondents felt calm in in regard of samples and written material, and also concerning the possibility of their child in the future being identified as having high risk of developing Type 1 diabetes. An important finding concerning access and control of mainly biological data was indicated, with the respondents expressing concern for potential future use. We believe our findings indicate that this kind of empirical studies can substantially contribute to our understanding of bioethical issues of medical research involving genetics. Issues, such as safeguards ensuring the ethical criteria of autonomy and respect, were emphasised by our respondents. We believe the issues brought up may promote further discussion, and do suggest issues for consideration by, among others, researchers, bioethicists and Institutional Review Boards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12710563     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022556705853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  16 in total

1.  Children of the 90s II: challenges for the ethics and law committee.

Authors:  S E Mumford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Genetic risk and behavioural change.

Authors:  T M Marteau; C Lerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

3.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Neonatal screening: ethical aspects.

Authors:  G Hermerén
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1999-12

5.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; P D Murphy; M S Watson; P A Barr
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Consent for clinical research.

Authors:  L F Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact.

Authors:  S Michie; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Mothers of children in ABIS, a population-based screening for prediabetes, experience few ethical conflicts and have a positive attitude.

Authors:  Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Gustafsson-Stolt; Per-Erik Liss; Tommy Svensson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group.

Authors:  J Moreno; A L Caplan; P R Wolpe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.

Authors:  G Helgesson; J Ludvigsson; U Gustafsson Stolt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Swartling
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Ulrica Swartling; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013-01-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.