Literature DB >> 10722485

Comparative pharmacodynamics of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in an in vitro dynamic model: prediction of equiefficient doses and the breakpoints of the area under the curve/MIC ratio.

S N Vostrov1, O V Kononenko, I Y Lubenko, S H Zinner, A A Firsov.   

Abstract

To demonstrate the impact of the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin (GA) relative to those of ciprofloxacin (CI) on the antimicrobial effect (AME), the killing and regrowth kinetics of two differentially susceptible clinical isolates each of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were studied. With each organism, a series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles of GA (half-life [t(1/2)], 7 h) and CI (t(1/2) = 4 h) were simulated to mimic different single doses of GA and two 12-h doses of CI. The respective eightfold ranges of the ratios of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC were 58 to 466 and 116 to 932 (microg. h/ml)/(microg/ml). The species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (I(E)) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for GA and CI (r(2) = 0.99 in both cases). The predicted AUC/MIC ratio for GA that might be equivalent to a clinically relevant AUC/MIC breakpoint for CI was estimated to be 102 rather than 125 (microg. h/ml)/(microg/ml). The respective MIC breakpoints were 0.32 microg/ml (for a 400-mg dose of GA) and 0.18 microg/ml (for two 500-mg doses of CI). On the basis of the I(E)-log AUC/MIC relationships, equiefficient 24-h doses (D(24h)s) of GA and CI were calculated for hypothetical strains of S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae for which the MICs were equal to the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited. To provide an "acceptable" I(E) equal to 200 (log CFU/ml). h, i.e., the I(E) provided by AUC/MIC of 125 (microg. h/ml)/(microg/ml) for ciprofloxacin, the D(24h)s of GA for all three organisms were much lower (115, 30, and 60 mg) than the clinically proposed 400-mg dose. Although the usual dose of CI (two doses of 500 mg) would be in excess for E. coli and K. pneumoniae (D(24h) = two doses of 40 mg and two doses of 115 mg, respectively), even the highest clinical dose of CI (two doses of 750 mg) might be insufficient for S. aureus (D(24h), > two doses of 1,000 mg). The method of generalization of data obtained with specific organisms to other representatives of the same species described in the present report might be useful for prediction of the AMEs of new quinolones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10722485      PMCID: PMC89786          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.879-884.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

1.  The in-vitro activity of trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, against Gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  A M Sefton; J P Maskell; A M Rafay; A Whiley; J D Williams
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Quantitative analysis of antimicrobial effect kinetics in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  A A Firsov; V M Chernykh; S M Navashin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Parameters of bacterial killing and regrowth kinetics and antimicrobial effect examined in terms of area under the concentration-time curve relationships: action of ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  A A Firsov; S N Vostrov; A A Shevchenko; G Cornaglia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The comparative pharmacokinetics of five quinolones.

Authors:  R Wise; D Lister; C A McNulty; D Griggs; J M Andrews
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Prediction of the antimicrobial effects of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin on staphylococci using an in-vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  A A Firsov; R G Vasilov; S N Vostrov; O V Kononenko; I Y Lubenko; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Inter- and intraquinolone predictors of antimicrobial effect in an in vitro dynamic model: new insight into a widely used concept.

Authors:  A A Firsov; A A Shevchenko; S N Vostrov; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  A new approach to in vitro comparisons of antibiotics in dynamic models: equivalent area under the curve/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin against bacteria of similar susceptibilities.

Authors:  A A Firsov; S N Vostrov; A A Shevchenko; Y A Portnoy; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Predictors of effect of ampicillin-sulbactam against TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model: enzyme activity versus MIC.

Authors:  A A Firsov; D Saverino; D Savarino; M Ruble; D Gilbert; B Manzano; A A Medeiros; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after oral and parenteral administration.

Authors:  G Höffken; H Lode; C Prinzing; K Borner; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of Modeling Techniques to Aid in Antibiotic Selection.

Authors:  Alexander A. Firsov; Stephen H. Zinner
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Kelly Ennis; Lavern Vercaigne; Andrew Walkty; Alfred S Gin; John Embil; Heather Smith; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Sergey N Vostrov; Irene Y Lubenko; Karl Drlica; Yury A Portnoy; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antistaphylococcal effect related to the area under the curve/MIC ratio in an in vitro dynamic model: predicted breakpoints versus clinically achievable values for seven fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Irene Y Lubenko; Sergey N Vostrov; Yury A Portnoy; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.