Literature DB >> 12708694

Properties of several fly ash materials in relation to use as soil amendments.

S M Pathan1, L A G Aylmore, T D Colmer.   

Abstract

Fly ash samples from five power stations in Western Australia and Queensland, and two soils used for horticulture in Western Australia, were evaluated for a series of physical and chemical properties. Soils were comprised primarily of coarse sand-sized particles, whereas most of the fly ashes were primarily fine sand- and silt-sized particles. Hydraulic conductivities in the fly ashes were 105- to 248-fold slower than in the soils. The water-holding capacities of fly ashes at "field capacity" were three times higher than those of the soils. Extractable P in the fly ashes (except Tarong and Callide) were 20- to 88-fold higher than in the soils. The pH showed considerable variation among the different sources of fly ash, with samples from Muja being the most acidic (pH = 3.8; 1:5 in CaCl2 extract) and from Gladstone the most alkaline (pH = 9.9). The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) values indicate that the potential for release of trace elements from the fly ashes was well below regulatory levels. When applied at sufficient rates (e.g., to achieve 10% w/w in surface layers) to sandy soils, fly ash altered texture and increased water-holding capacity. Depending on the source of fly ash used, such amendments could also provide P and aid nutrient retention by increasing the phosphorus retention index (PRI) and/or cation exchange capacity (CEC). The considerable variability in physical and chemical properties among the fly ash samples evaluated in the present study supports the notion that field trials are essential to the future development of soil amendment strategies making use of any particular source of fly ash.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12708694     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.6870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  7 in total

1.  Arsenic and copper stabilisation in a contaminated soil by coal fly ash and green waste compost.

Authors:  Daniel C W Tsang; Alex C K Yip; William E Olds; Paul A Weber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Agronomic biofortification of cereal crop plants with Fe, Zn, and Se, by the utilization of coal fly ash as plant growth media.

Authors:  J Bilski; D Jacob; F Soumaila; C Kraft; A Farnsworth
Journal:  Adv Biores       Date:  2012-12

3.  Potential of fly ash for neutralisation of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Asif Qureshi; Yu Jia; Christian Maurice; Björn Öhlander
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Preliminary study of coal fly ash (FA) phytoremediation by selected cereal crops.

Authors:  Jerzy Bilski; Donna Jacob; Kyle Mclean; Erin McLean; Mardee Lander
Journal:  Adv Biores       Date:  2012-12

5.  Environmental health aspects of coal ash phytoremediation by selected crops.

Authors:  Jerzy Bilski; Kyle McLean; Erin McLean; Fakira Soumaila; Mardee Lander
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci       Date:  2011

6.  Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil Properties and Artemisia ordosica Growth under Combined Application of Fly Ash and Polyacrylamide in North China.

Authors:  Jiping Niu; Xiaoling Su; Zejun Tang; Kaiwen Lu; Gengxi Zhang; Fengxin Wang; Jie Wang
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Effects of Soil Amendment With Wood Ash on Transpiration, Growth, and Metal Uptake in Two Contrasting Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Drought Tolerance.

Authors:  Leila Romdhane; Leonard Barnabas Ebinezer; Anna Panozzo; Giuseppe Barion; Cristian Dal Cortivo; Leila Radhouane; Teofilo Vamerali
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.