Literature DB >> 12708661

Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review.

D F Grigal1.   

Abstract

Nearly all Hg in vegetation is derived directly from the atmosphere. Mass of Hg in forest vegetation (roughly 0.1 mg m(-2)) is about an order of magnitude smaller than that in the forest floor (1 mg m(-2)) and two orders of magnitude smaller than that in the mineral soil (10 mg m(-2)). Mass of Hg in peat (20 mg m(-2)) is greater than the sum of that in mineral soil and the forest floor; wetlands usually sequester more Hg than associated uplands. The strong relationship of Hg to organic matter, associated with binding by reduced S groups, is fundamental to understanding Hg distribution and behavior in terrestrial systems. The stoichiometry of the Hg-C relationship varies; Hg-S relationships, though less variable, are not constant. Because of the Hg-organic matter link, landscape conditions that lead to differential soil organic matter accumulation are likely to lead to differential Hg accumulation. The ratio of methylmercury (MeHg) to total Hg is generally low in both vegetation (near 1.5%) and soil (<1%), but areas of poorly drained soils and wetlands are sites of MeHg production. The annual emission of anthropic Hg from the 48 contiguous states of the USA (144 Mg) is two orders of magnitude less than the pool of Hg in forests of those states (30,300 Mg). Peatlands, less than 2% of total land area, sequester more than 20 times annual emissions (2930 Mg). If global climate change affects C storage it will indirectly affect Hg storage, having a major effect on the balance between emissions and sequestration and on the global Hg cycle.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12708661     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.3930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  24 in total

Review 1.  Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Heterogeneous selection in a spatially structured environment affects fitness tradeoffs of plasmid carriage in pseudomonads.

Authors:  Frances R Slater; Kenneth D Bruce; Richard J Ellis; Andrew K Lilley; Sarah L Turner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution and variation of mercury in frozen soils of a high-altitude permafrost region on the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Shiwei Sun; Shichang Kang; Jie Huang; Shengyun Chen; Qianggong Zhang; Junming Guo; Wenjie Liu; Bigyan Neupane; Dahe Qin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Stream Mercury Export in Response to Contemporary Timber Harvesting Methods (Pacific Coastal Mountains, Oregon, USA).

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; Brandon Kowalski; Robert Danehy; Sherri L Johnson; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Mercury and arsenic in the surface peat soils of the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China: distribution, environmental controls, sources, and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Zucheng Wang; Hongyan Zhao; Matthew Peros; Qiannan Yang; Shasha Liu; Hongkai Li; Shengzhong Wang; Zhaojun Bu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Cadmium and mercury accumulation in European hare (Lepus europaeus): age-dependent relationships in renal and hepatic tissue.

Authors:  Zoran Petrović; Vlado Teodorović; Spomenka Djurić; Dragan Milićević; Danijela Vranić; Mirjana Lukić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Impacts of forest harvesting on mobilization of Hg and MeHg in drained peatland forests on black schist or felsic bedrock.

Authors:  Liisa Ukonmaanaho; Mike Starr; Marjatta Kantola; Ari Laurén; Juha Piispanen; Heidi Pietilä; Paavo Perämäki; Päivi Merilä; Hannu Fritze; Tero Tuomivirta; Juha Heikkinen; Jari Mäkinen; Tiina M Nieminen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Increased mercury in forest soils under elevated carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Susan M Natali; Sergio A Sañudo-Wilhelmy; Richard J Norby; Hong Zhang; Adrien C Finzi; Manuel T Lerdau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Spatial and vertical distribution of mercury in upland forest soils across the northeastern United States.

Authors:  Justin B Richardson; Andrew J Friedland; Teresa R Engerbretson; James M Kaste; Brian P Jackson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Volcanic mercury in Pinus canariensis.

Authors:  José Antonio Rodríguez Martín; Nikos Nanos; José Carlos Miranda; Gregoria Carbonell; Luis Gil
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.