Literature DB >> 12707693

[Tibial malalignment of mobile-bearing prostheses--a simulator study].

I Löer1, W Plitz.   

Abstract

Total knee replacement requires exact implantation in order to avoid long-term failure. Longitudinal in vivo studies of malaligned prostheses are problematic for ethical reasons. To assess the critical angle of tibial (varus/valgus) malalignment of knee prostheses in vitro, a simulator investigation was performed. Mobile-bearing prostheses were implanted in a simulator with 1-3 degrees valgus and varus malalignment as well as in a neutral position. More extreme malalignment caused unacceptable forces in the simulator. After each 500,000 cycles (ca. 0.5 years of walking) the replicas of the polyethylene inlay were examined and the extent of the tribocontact areas was measured until 1,500,000 total cycles. Finally the original polyethylene was examined with a scanning electron microscope. The polyethylene showed only abrasive wear without any fatigue effect. Tribocontact areas of 900-1500 mm(2) were observed under malalignment of mobile-bearing prostheses according to the manufacturer's specifications. With 1-3 degrees of malalignment, tribocontact areas were located at atypical polyethylene zones, but still showed abrasive wear only. Increasing malalignment due to a lift off of the femoral part of the prostheses with a strong torsional strength of the polyethylene made more extreme simulation impossible. Malalignment of 3 degrees could be suggested as maximum in vivo tolerability; perfect alignment with ideal implantation should be the goal. Soft tissue was given less consideration in this simulator study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12707693     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-002-0440-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  7 in total

1.  Centre of the posterior cruciate ligament and the sulcus between tubercle spines are reliable landmarks for tibial component placement.

Authors:  Namık Sahin; Teoman Atıcı; Ünal Kurtoğlu; Ali Turgut; Güven Ozkaya; Yüksel Ozkan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Agreement between radiological and computer navigation measurement of lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Julian Dexel; Stephan Kirschner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Encouraging treatment algorithm for computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA): A retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  J Cip; M Widemschek; C Bach; P Ruckenstuhl; T Benesch; K Studer; A Martin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-24

Review 5.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Application of the "Taylor Spatial Frame" with unilateral implantation of a medial sledge prosthesis after posttraumatic dislocation of the femur. A complicated progression].

Authors:  S Höll; V Stoll
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  A rare case of bilateral large osteolysis following cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Julian Dexel; Stephan Kirschner; Melinda K Harman; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.