Literature DB >> 12707116

Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.

Christoph Wiesenack1, Christopher Prasser, Gabriele Rödig, Cornelius Keyl.   

Abstract

Assessment of cardiac performance and adequate fluid replacement of a critically ill patient are important goals of a clinician. We designed this study to evaluate the ability of stroke volume variation (SVV), derived from pulse contour analysis, and frequently used preload variables (central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) to predict the response of stroke volume index and cardiac index to volume replacement in normoventilated cardiac surgical patients. We studied 20 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. After the induction of anesthesia, hemodynamic measurements were performed before (T1) and subsequent to volume replacement by infusion of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 (7 mL/kg) with a rate of 1 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1). Except for heart rate, all hemodynamic variables changed significantly (P < 0.01) after volume loading. Linear regression analysis between SVV at baseline (T1) and DeltaSVV after volume application showed a significant correlation (r = -0.97; P < 0.01), whereas linear regression analysis between SVV (T1) and percentage changes of stroke volume index (r = 0.19) and cardiac index (r = 0.17) did not reveal a significant relationship between variables. The results of our study suggest that SVV derived from pulse contour analysis cannot serve as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in normoventilated cardiac surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12707116     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000053237.29264.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  18 in total

1.  The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Hadian; Donald A Severyn; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Sebastian Mair; Julia Tschirdewahn; Simon Götz; Johanna Frank; Veit Phillip; Benedikt Henschel; Caroline Schultheiss; Ulrich Mayr; Sebastian Noe; Matthias Treiber; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.

Authors:  Teiji Sawa; Mao Kinoshita; Atsushi Kainuma; Koichi Akiyama; Yoshifumi Naito; Hideya Kato; Fumimasa Amaya; Keiji Shigemi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Validity of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) Compared with Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness.

Authors:  Abhishek Rathore; Shalendra Singh; Ritesh Lamsal; Priya Taank; Debashish Paul
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

6.  Does the systolic pressure variation change in the prone position?

Authors:  Roger Marks; Richard Silverman; Raul Fernandez; Keith A Candiotti; Eugene Fu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  [Arterial pressure curve and fluid status].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Continuous hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic gastric bypass in superobese patients by pressure recording analytical method.

Authors:  Tania Balderi; Francesco Forfori; Valeria Marra; Claudio Di Salvo; Massimo Dorigo; Marco Anselmino; Salvatore Mario Romano; Francesco Giunta
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  [Assessment of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Low molecular weight pentastarch is more effective than crystalloid solution in goal-directed fluid management in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kotake; Mitsue Fukuda; Aya Yamagata; Ririko Iwasaki; Daisuke Toyoda; Nobukazu Sato; Ryoichi Ochiai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.