Literature DB >> 12706719

In silico protein recombination: enhancing template and sequence alignment selection for comparative protein modelling.

Bruno Contreras-Moreira1, Paul W Fitzjohn, Paul A Bates.   

Abstract

Comparative modelling of proteins is a predictive technique to build an atomic model for a given amino acid sequence, on the basis of the structures of other proteins (templates) that have been determined experimentally. Critical problems arise in this procedure: selecting the correct templates, aligning the query sequence with them and building the non-conserved surface loops. In this work, we apply a genetic algorithm, with crossover and mutation, as a new tool to overcome the first two. In silico protein recombination proves to be an effective way to exploit the variability of templates and sequence alignments to produce populations of optimized models by artificial selection. Despite some limitations, the procedure is shown to be robust to alignment errors, while simplifying the task of selecting templates, making it a good candidate for automatic building of reliable protein models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12706719     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00309-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  16 in total

1.  Detection of homologous proteins by an intermediate sequence search.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Descriptor-based protein remote homology identification.

Authors:  Ziding Zhang; Sunil Kochhar; Martin G Grigorov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling.

Authors:  Per Larsson; Björn Wallner; Erik Lindahl; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  From local structure to a global framework: recognition of protein folds.

Authors:  Agnel Praveen Joseph; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  A comparison of different functions for predicted protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Juan Li; Huisheng Fang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Coverage of whole proteome by structural genomics observed through protein homology modeling database.

Authors:  Kei Yura; Akihiro Yamaguchi; Mitiko Go
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2006-12-05

7.  M4T: a comparative protein structure modeling server.

Authors:  Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Carlos J Madrid-Aliste; Brajesh Kumar Rai; J Eduardo Fajardo; András Fiser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Alternating evolutionary pressure in a genetic algorithm facilitates protein model selection.

Authors:  Marc N Offman; Alexander L Tournier; Paul A Bates
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-08-01

9.  Improving the quality of protein structure models by selecting from alignment alternatives.

Authors:  Ingolf Sommer; Stefano Toppo; Oliver Sander; Thomas Lengauer; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.