Literature DB >> 12706529

The absence of DNA polymerase kappa does not affect somatic hypermutation of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain gene.

Takeyuki Shimizu1, Yoichi Shinkai, Tomoo Ogi, Haruo Ohmori, Takachika Azuma.   

Abstract

During the immune response to T cell-dependent antigen, somatic hypermutation (SHM) is introduced into immunoglobulin (Ig) genes. The variable region is the target for SHM and it is here that DNA lesions are introduced and mutations are generated. It has been suggested that error-prone DNA polymerase(s) may play an important role in this mutagenesis phase. Recently, DNA polymerase kappa (Polkappa), which belongs to the Y-family of DNA polymerases, was identified. Since a hot spot of SHMs (RGYW motif) is also a hot spot of mutations by human Polkappa, this enzyme was suggested to be an SHM instigator. In order to address the question whether Polkappa is involved in SHM, we immunized Polkappa-deficient mice and analyzed the SHM of the Ig heavy chain gene. We found that the SHM frequency and spectrum were indistinguishable between the Polkappa knockout mice and control mice. These results suggested that Polkappa is not essential for this process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12706529     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2478(03)00046-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Lett        ISSN: 0165-2478            Impact factor:   3.685


  10 in total

Review 1.  DNA polymerases and somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  Mineaki Seki; Patricia J Gearhart; Richard D Wood
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Evaluation of molecular models for the affinity maturation of antibodies: roles of cytosine deamination by AID and DNA repair.

Authors:  Mala Samaranayake; Janusz M Bujnicki; Michael Carpenter; Ashok S Bhagwat
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Antibody diversification caused by disrupted mismatch repair and promiscuous DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Kimberly J Zanotti; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-12-02

4.  Different mutation signatures in DNA polymerase eta- and MSH6-deficient mice suggest separate roles in antibody diversification.

Authors:  Stella A Martomo; William W Yang; Robert P Wersto; Tsuyoshi Ohkumo; Yuji Kondo; Masayuki Yokoi; Chikahide Masutani; Fumio Hanaoka; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Overexpression of human DNA polymerase mu (Pol mu) in a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line affects the somatic hypermutation rate.

Authors:  José F Ruiz; Daniel Lucas; Esther García-Palomero; Ana I Saez; Manuel A González; Miguel A Piris; Antonio Bernad; Luis Blanco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  AID and somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Robert W Maul; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.543

7.  Translesion synthesis polymerases in the prevention and promotion of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  L Jay Stallons; W Glenn McGregor
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-22

Review 8.  New insights into abasic site repair and tolerance.

Authors:  Petria S Thompson; David Cortez
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-04-30

9.  DNA polymerase eta is the sole contributor of A/T modifications during immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in the mouse.

Authors:  Frédéric Delbos; Said Aoufouchi; Ahmad Faili; Jean-Claude Weill; Claude-Agnès Reynaud
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 10.  Mutating for Good: DNA Damage Responses During Somatic Hypermutation.

Authors:  Bas Pilzecker; Heinz Jacobs
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.