Literature DB >> 12705814

Lateral phase mucosal wave asymmetries in the clinical voice laboratory.

C Michael Haben1, Karen Kost, George Papagiannis.   

Abstract

Anecdotally, in some persons it has been observed by the Senior Author (K.K.) that asymmetries of the mucosal wave exist when examined videostroboscopically. In the vast majority of these people, no pathology is ever discovered. Mucosal wave asymmetries could cause concern for the otolaryngologist, who may consider them to be a forewarning of subclinical pathology and subject the patient to unnecessary, expensive, and anxiety-provoking investigations or interventions. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of mucosal wave asymmetries in an asymptomatic population lacking laryngeal pathology. Acoustic spectral analysis is also utilized to determine if the presence of subharmonics might be associated. A hospital-based, cross-sectional study design was used. The subjects had no known vocal or medical pathologies, and were nonsmoking. The study group was composed of 30 males aged 35-50 years and 30 women between 22-55 years. Each of the males underwent acoustic spectral analysis; and all subjects completed a medical questionnaire, subjective talkativeness rating, and videostroboscopic laryngeal examination. 10.5% of the subjects (exact 95% CI = 4.0-21.5%) exhibited mucosal wave variations at stroboscopy, characterized as periodic lateral phase asymmetries found consistently in both the modal and upper registers. There was no association with the chosen acoustic spectral parameters, talkativeness scales, or questionnaire-based variables. Mucosal wave asymmetries may be a variance of normal, and are likely to be far more common in the general population than previously believed. The prevalence detected here is expected to be important in the clinical laryngology practice, where these asymmetries may be frequently encountered and influencing management decisions. There has been little normative data published for variations of the mucosal wave specifically for epidemiological purposes. Clinically, in the absence of such data, otolaryngologists may over interpret videostroboscopic findings, leading to unnecessary investigations or interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12705814     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(03)00032-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  11 in total

1.  Investigating acoustic correlates of human vocal fold vibratory phase asymmetry through modeling and laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Matías Zaéartu; Thomas F Quatieri; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Quantitative study of vibrational symmetry of injured vocal folds via digital kymography in excised canine larynges.

Authors:  Christopher R Krausert; Di Ying; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  [The significance of videostroboscopy in laryngological practice].

Authors:  S Fleischer; M Hess
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Acoustic and perceptual effects of left-right laryngeal asymmetries based on computational modeling.

Authors:  Robin A Samlan; Brad H Story; Andrew J Lotto; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Automated measurement of vocal fold vibratory asymmetry from high-speed videoendoscopy recordings.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Dimitar D Deliyski; Thomas F Quatieri; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effects of asymmetric superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on glottic posture, acoustics, vibration.

Authors:  Dinesh K Chhetri; Juergen Neubauer; Jennifer L Bergeron; Elazar Sofer; Kevin A Peng; Nausheen Jamal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Evaluation of clinical value of videokymography for diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders.

Authors:  Ketaki Vasant Phadke; Jitka Vydrová; Romana Domagalská; Jan G Švec
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Effects of Laryngeal Vibratory Asymmetry and Neuromuscular Compensation on Voice Quality.

Authors:  Pranati Pillutla; Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman; Holly Wilhalme; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Fold Vibratory Asymmetry.

Authors:  Shaghauyegh S Azar; Pranati Pillutla; Lauran K Evans; Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.970

10.  Analysis of vibratory mode changes in symmetric and asymmetric activation of the canine larynx.

Authors:  Patrick Schlegel; David A Berry; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.