Literature DB >> 12703341

Handheld computers. A feasible alternative to paper forms for field data collection.

Linda A Fletcher1, Darin J Erickson, Traci L Toomey, Alexander C Wagenaar.   

Abstract

Recent advances in handheld computer hardware and software may provide alternatives to paper-based data collection methods. The authors compared data collected with paper forms to data collected with handheld computer-based forms in a field observation study of alcohol purchase attempts at 47 community festivals in a large metropolitan area. Agreement between data collected with paper forms and data collected with handheld computers was greater than 95%. Computer-based forms handled branching patterns better and yielded data that were immediately available for analyses. Paper forms handled written comments better. Handheld computers are a feasible alternative to paper forms for field data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12703341     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X02250527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  20 in total

1.  Experiences with a PDA-based documentation system in clinical research.

Authors:  Torben K Becker; André Gries; Eike Martin; Michael Bernhard
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Use of personal digital assistants for data collection in a multi-site AIDS stigma study in rural south Nyanza, Kenya.

Authors:  M A Onono; N Carraher; R C Cohen; E A Bukusi; J M Turan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Paul Gorman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Experiences of Nursing Personnel Using PDAs in Home Health Care Services in Norwegian Municipalities.

Authors:  Linda M Hansen; Mariann Fossum; Olle Söderhamn; Ann Fruhling
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

5.  PGMS: a case study of collecting PDA-based geo-tagged malaria-related survey data.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Neil F Lobo; Adam Wolkon; John E Gimnig; Alpha Malishee; Jennifer Stevenson; Frank H Collins; Greg Madey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Patient versus professional based psychosocial risk factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Chantal Quispel; Mieke J van Veen; Christianne Zuijderhoudt; Eric A P Steegers; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-11

7.  Modern geographical reconnaissance of target populations in malaria elimination zones.

Authors:  Gerard C Kelly; Jeffrey Hii; William Batarii; Wesley Donald; Erick Hale; Johnny Nausien; Scott Pontifex; Andrew Vallely; Marcel Tanner; Archie Clements
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Personal digital assistants to collect tuberculosis bacteriology data in Peru reduce delays, errors, and workload, and are acceptable to users: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joaquín A Blaya; Ted Cohen; Pablo Rodríguez; Jihoon Kim; Hamish S F Fraser
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.

Authors:  Shannon J Lane; Nancy M Heddle; Emmy Arnold; Irwin Walker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Prospective evaluation of direct approach with a tablet device as a strategy to enhance survey study participant response rate.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Asmaa Manan; Sara Urbanski
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.