OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based system for collecting tuberculosis test results and to compare this new system to the previous paper-based system. The PDA- and paper-based systems were evaluated based on processing times, frequency of errors, and number of work-hours expended by data collectors. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 93 health establishments in Peru. Baseline data were collected for 19 months. Districts (n=4) were then randomly assigned to intervention (PDA) or control (paper) groups, and further data were collected for 6 months. Comparisons were made between intervention and control districts and within-districts before and after the introduction of the intervention. RESULTS: The PDA-based system had a significant effect on processing times (p<0.001) and errors (p=0.005). In the between-districts comparison, the median processing time for cultures was reduced from 23 to 8 days and for smears was reduced from 25 to 12 days. In that comparison, the proportion of cultures with delays >90 days was reduced from 9.2% to 0.1% and the number of errors was decreased by 57.1%. The intervention reduced the work-hours necessary to process results by 70% and was preferred by all users. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed PDA-based system to collect data from institutions over a large, resource-poor area can significantly reduce delays, errors, and person-hours spent processing data.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based system for collecting tuberculosis test results and to compare this new system to the previous paper-based system. The PDA- and paper-based systems were evaluated based on processing times, frequency of errors, and number of work-hours expended by data collectors. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 93 health establishments in Peru. Baseline data were collected for 19 months. Districts (n=4) were then randomly assigned to intervention (PDA) or control (paper) groups, and further data were collected for 6 months. Comparisons were made between intervention and control districts and within-districts before and after the introduction of the intervention. RESULTS: The PDA-based system had a significant effect on processing times (p<0.001) and errors (p=0.005). In the between-districts comparison, the median processing time for cultures was reduced from 23 to 8 days and for smears was reduced from 25 to 12 days. In that comparison, the proportion of cultures with delays >90 days was reduced from 9.2% to 0.1% and the number of errors was decreased by 57.1%. The intervention reduced the work-hours necessary to process results by 70% and was preferred by all users. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed PDA-based system to collect data from institutions over a large, resource-poor area can significantly reduce delays, errors, and person-hours spent processing data.
Authors: Michel A Missinou; Christopher H O Olola; Saadou Issifou; Pierre-Blaise Matsiegui; Ayola A Adegnika; Steffen Borrmann; David Wypij; Terrie E Taylor; Peter G Kremsner Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: T K Kvien; P Mowinckel; T Heiberg; K L Dammann; Ø Dale; G J Aanerud; T N Alme; T Uhlig Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Joaquin A Blaya; Sonya S Shin; Martin J A Yagui; Gloria Yale; Carmen Z Suarez; Luis L Asencios; J Peter Cegielski; Hamish S F Fraser Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2007-10-28 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Grant Theron; Helen E Jenkins; Frank Cobelens; Ibrahim Abubakar; Aamir J Khan; Ted Cohen; David W Dowdy Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julia Driessen; Marco Cioffi; Noor Alide; Zach Landis-Lewis; Gervase Gamadzi; Oliver Jintha Gadabu; Gerald Douglas Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hamish S F Fraser; David Thomas; Juan Tomaylla; Nadia Garcia; Leonid Lecca; Megan Murray; Mercedes C Becerra Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Joaquín A Blaya; Sonya S Shin; Martin Yagui; Carmen Contreras; Peter Cegielski; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Luis Asencios; Jaime Bayona; Jihoon Kim; Hamish S F Fraser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240