OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in combination with a newly developed semiautomated software program with calibrated aortography in patients who are scheduled for endovascular aortic stent graft placement. METHODS: From November 2000 until December 2001, seven patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) underwent both calibrated aortography and MSCT for preoperative endovascular stent graft planning. Both studies were performed within 14 days. Further, length measurements were performed with a semiautomated computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) calibration method and a conventional calibrated aortography technique using three differently configured tubes with variable tortuosity. The AAA length measurements of the semiautomated CTA calibration method and the calibrated aortography were compared. RESULTS: Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis and revealed a probability value of 0.000381 and an r2 value of 0.93. Using phantoms, it is proven by the authors that the accuracy of the semiautomated CTA calibration method increases with increasing tortuosity when compared with the conventional calibrated aortography technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results show that the semiautomated CTA calibration method has a potentially advantageous role in preoperative stent graft planning regarding the aortic length measurements and seems to be more accurate than calibrated aortography, especially in extremely tortuous vessels. Further studies have to be performed, however.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in combination with a newly developed semiautomated software program with calibrated aortography in patients who are scheduled for endovascular aortic stent graft placement. METHODS: From November 2000 until December 2001, seven patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) underwent both calibrated aortography and MSCT for preoperative endovascular stent graft planning. Both studies were performed within 14 days. Further, length measurements were performed with a semiautomated computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) calibration method and a conventional calibrated aortography technique using three differently configured tubes with variable tortuosity. The AAA length measurements of the semiautomated CTA calibration method and the calibrated aortography were compared. RESULTS: Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis and revealed a probability value of 0.000381 and an r2 value of 0.93. Using phantoms, it is proven by the authors that the accuracy of the semiautomated CTA calibration method increases with increasing tortuosity when compared with the conventional calibrated aortography technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results show that the semiautomated CTA calibration method has a potentially advantageous role in preoperative stent graft planning regarding the aortic length measurements and seems to be more accurate than calibrated aortography, especially in extremely tortuous vessels. Further studies have to be performed, however.