Literature DB >> 12702712

Recognition by top-down and bottom-up processing in cortex: the control of selective attention.

Dan Graboi1, John Lisman.   

Abstract

Visual recognition is achieved by a hierarchy of bidirectionally connected cortical areas. The entry of signals into higher areas involves the serial sampling of information within a movable window of attention. Here we explore how the cortex can move this window and integrate the sampled information. To make this concrete, we modeled the process of visual word recognition by hierarchical cortical areas representing features, letters, and words. At the start of the recognition process, nodes representing all contextually possible words are active. Simple connectivity rules allow a parallel top-down (T-D) computation of the relative probability of each feature at each location given the set of active words. This information is then used to guide the window of attention to information-rich features (e.g., a feature that is present in the visual image but has lowest probability). Bottom-up processing of this feature excludes words that do not contain it and leads to T-D recomputation of feature probabilities. Recognition occurs after several such cycles when all but one word has been excluded. We show that when 950 words are stored in long-term memory, recognition occurs after an average of 4.9 cycles. Because covert attention can be moved every 20-30 ms, word recognition could be as fast as determined experimentally (<200 ms of cortical processing). This model accounts for the findings that recognition time depends logarithmically on set size, recognition time is reduced when context reduces the number of possible targets, the time to classify a nonword decreases when its approximation to English decreases, and in high level cortex, the firing of neurons tuned to an object increases progressively as its recognition occurs. More generally the model provides a physiologically plausible view of how bi-directional signal flow in cortex guides attention to produce efficient recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12702712     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00777.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of understanding the brain: where we stand in 2015.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity.

Authors:  Patrick Sadil; Kevin W Potter; David E Huber; Rosemary A Cowell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-05-09

3.  Banknote recognition: investigating processing and cognition framework using competitive neural network.

Authors:  Oyebade K Oyedotun; Adnan Khashman
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 4.  Computational psychiatry: from synapses to sentience.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 13.437

5.  Thalamus is a common locus of reading, arithmetic, and IQ: Analysis of local intrinsic functional properties.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Peter J Molfese; Michael P Milham; W Einar Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Neural representations of individual stimuli in humans revealed by gamma-band electrocorticographic activity.

Authors:  Joshua Jacobs; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space.

Authors:  Judith C Peters; Joel Reithler; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  A Biologically Plausible Transform for Visual Recognition that is Invariant to Translation, Scale, and Rotation.

Authors:  Pavel Sountsov; David M Santucci; John E Lisman
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  The proactive brain and the fate of dead hypotheses.

Authors:  Amir Tal; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Neuropsychological evidence for the temporal dynamics of category-specific naming.

Authors:  Sven Panis; Katrien Torfs; Celine R Gillebert; Johan Wagemans; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2017-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.