Literature DB >> 12699540

In-hospital mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume.

Fred G Barker1, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, William E Butler, Christopher S Ogilvy, Bob S Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of adverse outcome after contemporary surgical treatment of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. Patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics were tested as potential outcome predictors, with particular attention to the surgeon's and hospital's volume of care.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study with the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1996 to 2000. Multivariate logistic and ordinal regression analyses were performed with endpoints of mortality, discharge other than to home, length of stay, and total hospital charges.
RESULTS: We identified 3498 patients who were treated at 463 hospitals, and we identified 585 surgeons in the database. Of all patients, 2.1% died, 3.3% were discharged to skilled-nursing facilities, and 12.8% were discharged to other facilities. The analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, primary payer, four variables measuring acuity of treatment and medical comorbidity, and five variables indicating symptoms and signs. The statistics for median annual number of unruptured aneurysms treated were eight per hospital and three per surgeon. High-volume hospitals had fewer adverse outcomes than hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms: discharge other than to home occurred after 15.6% of operations at high-volume hospitals (20 or more cases/yr) compared with 23.8% at low-volume hospitals (fewer than 4 cases/yr) (P = 0.002). High surgeon volume had a similar effect (15.3 versus 20.6%, P = 0.004). Mortality was lower at high-volume hospitals (1.6 versus 2.2%) than at hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms, but not significantly so. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had fewer postoperative neurological complications (P = 0.04). Length of stay was not related to hospital volume. Charges were slightly higher at high-volume hospitals, partly because arteriography was performed more frequently than at hospitals that handled comparatively fewer unruptured aneurysms.
CONCLUSION: For patients with unruptured aneurysms who were treated in the United States between 1996 and 2000, surgery performed at high-volume institutions or by high-volume surgeons was associated with significantly lower morbidity and modestly lower mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  26 in total

1.  Patient outcomes are better for unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated at centers that preferentially treat with endovascular coiling: a study of the national inpatient sample 2001-2007.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; A A Rabinstein; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; A A Rabinstein; D M Nasr; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Aggregate analysis of the literature for unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  Tony Lee; Michael Baytion; Robert Sciacca; J P Mohr; John Pile-Spellman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Surgical subspecialization: escape route for surgeons or added benefit for patients?

Authors:  Meredith J Sorensen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

5.  Treatment related morbidity of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: results of a prospective single centre series with an interdisciplinary approach over a 6 year period (1999-2005).

Authors:  Rüdiger Gerlach; Jürgen Beck; Matthias Setzer; Hartmut Vatter; Joachim Berkefeld; Richard Du Mesnil de Rochemont; Andreas Raabe; Volker Seifert
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness.

Authors:  R T Higashida; B J Lahue; M T Torbey; L N Hopkins; E Leip; D F Hanley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Unruptured cerebral aneurysm clipping: association of combined open and endovascular expertise with outcomes.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Dan Gottlieb; George Bovis; Yin Su; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; Pascal Jabbour; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Clipping and Coiling of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Jessica J Jalbert; Abby J Isaacs; Hooman Kamel; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  In-hospital morbidity and mortality after endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: effect of hospital and physician volume.

Authors:  Brian L Hoh; James D Rabinov; Johnny C Pryor; Bob S Carter; Fred G Barker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Safety and efficacy of neuroform for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective, consecutive, French multicentric study.

Authors:  J C Gentric; A Biondi; M Piotin; C Mounayer; K Lobotesis; A Bonafé; V Costalat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.