Literature DB >> 12695822

Imaging of the intracranial venous system with a contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated examination.

Stephan G Wetzel1, Meng Law, Vivian S Lee, Soonmee Cha, Glyn Johnson, Kim Nelson.   

Abstract

A contrast-enhanced interpolated, three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo MR sequence with asymmetric k-space sampling, which we refer to as volumetric interpolated brain examination (VIBE), was evaluated for its depiction of the normal intracranial venous system and compared with two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR venography (MRV). Fifteen subjects underwent contrast-enhanced VIBE imaging (TR/TE 8 ms/4.4 ms, flip angle 18 degrees, acquisition time, 2 min 20 s, voxel size approximately 1.5 mm(3)) and standard 2D TOF MRV (TR/TE 27 ms/9 ms, flip angle 35 degrees ). The presence of 19 venous structures per subject was assessed on maximum intensity projections (MIP) of the whole data set (whole-brain MIP) and on MIP images reconstructed spontaneously from source images (interactive MIP/source images). Results from a consensus reading where all imaging techniques and display modalities were available were taken as the standard of reference for the presence of venous structures. In addition, 10 subjects underwent both unenhanced and enhanced VIBE imaging. The value of subtracted data sets (unenhanced VIBE subtracted from enhanced VIBE) was then evaluated. Overall, VIBE provided a superior visualization of the cerebral veins than 2D TOF MRV (VIBE, sensitivity (reader 1/reader 2): 98%/99%, negative predictive value 64%/71%; TOF sensitivity: 85%/84%, negative predictive value 15%/15%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test VIBE vs TOF, p<0.001 for both readers). The VIBE interactive MIP/source images were superior to whole-brain MIP reconstructions. Image subtraction was not necessary for delineation of venous structures but improved small vein conspicuity. Contrast-enhanced VIBE acquisitions are faster and enable a visualization of the normal intracranial venous system superior to that of 2D TOF MRV.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12695822     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1714-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  The dural venous sinuses: normal intraluminal architecture defined on contrast-enhanced MR venography.

Authors:  Richard I Farb
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Intrinsic signal amplification in the application of 2D SENSE parallel imaging to 3D contrast-enhanced elliptical centric MRA and MRV.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Houchun Harry Hu; David G Kruger; Clifton R Haider; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  To TOF or not to TOF: strategies for non-contrast-enhanced intracranial MRA at 7 T.

Authors:  Stefan Maderwald; Susanne C Ladd; Elke R Gizewski; Oliver Kraff; Jens M Theysohn; Karsten Wicklow; Christoph Moenninghoff; Isabel Wanke; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Cerebral venous thrombosis: diagnostic accuracy of combined, dynamic and static, contrast-enhanced 4D MR venography.

Authors:  S Meckel; C Reisinger; J Bremerich; D Damm; M Wolbers; S Engelter; K Scheffler; S G Wetzel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Evaluation of the anatomy and variants of internal cerebral veins with phase-sensitive MR imaging.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Jiawei Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Xiangyang Gong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Role of contrast-enhanced MR venography in the preoperative evaluation of parasagittal meningiomas.

Authors:  Alessandro Bozzao; Vanina Finocchi; Andrea Romano; Michele Ferrante; Fabrizio Fasoli; Giuseppe Trillò; Luigi Ferrante; Luigi Maria Fantozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with GRAPPA on a 1.5-T system for imaging of craniocervical vascular disease: initial experience.

Authors:  Stephan Meckel; Ralf Mekle; Christian Taschner; Sven Haller; Klaus Scheffler; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Stephan G Wetzel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-03-11       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial venous system with fourfold accelerated two-dimensional sensitivity encoding.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; David G Kruger; Clifton R Haider; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Preoperative evaluation of collateral venous anastomoses in meningioma involving cerebral venous sinus by susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Jingzhen He; Xiangxing Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Evaluation of Venous Drainage Patterns for Skull Base Meningioma Surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhide Adachi; Mitsuhiro Hasegawa; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.