Literature DB >> 12695159

How do GPs use x rays to manage chronic knee pain in the elderly? A case study.

J Bedson1, K Jordan, P Croft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether clinical signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis influence general practitioners' (GPs) decisions about x raying older patients with knee pain and whether x ray reports alter their initial treatment or referral plan.
METHODS: A cross sectional survey of 1000 GPs in England and Wales using "paper cases" in three questionnaires mailed at two-weekly intervals. The first questionnaire assessed GPs' management of patients with knee pain using four case scenarios, two with features of clinical knee osteoarthritis. The second questionnaire contained the same scenarios with information on x ray findings added. The third questionnaire considered management of knee pain in general.
RESULTS: 447 GPs responded to questionnaire 1, 316 (71%) to questionnaire 2, 287 (64%) to questionnaire 3. 106 responders (25%) would have x rayed all four patients and 64 (15%) none. Choosing to carry out an x ray examination was not influenced by the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis but was linked to other management choices, such as referral to orthopaedics (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62 to 2.81). The strongest predictor in questionnaire 2 of a treatment or referral was whether it had been chosen in the first survey. However, the x ray report was associated with a significant change in treatment and referrals. Where radiographic osteoarthritis was present, GPs were less likely to refer to a physiotherapist (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.83) or rheumatologist (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.28), and more likely to refer to an orthopaedic surgeon (OR 31.34; 95% CI 21.51 to 45.66). Questionnaire 3 showed that GPs' general views on the use of x rays correlated with the frequency of their choosing to x ray in the four individual case scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS: A GP's choice to x ray older people with knee symptoms is linked with decisions on treatment and referral even before the x ray result is known, but it does not appear to be influenced by clinical features of osteoarthritis. The presence of radiographic osteoarthritis has a marked impact on the decision to refer to secondary care. More evidence on the outcome of management without x rays is needed to help GPs in decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12695159      PMCID: PMC1754519          DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.5.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  M T Hannan; D T Felson; T Pincus
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Do clinical findings associate with radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee?

Authors:  A A Claessens; J S Schouten; F A van den Ouweland; H A Valkenburg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.

Authors:  D C Hadorn; A C Holmes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-11

Review 4.  Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care.

Authors:  G Peat; R McCarney; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Osteoarthritis in knees of aged persons. Relationship between roentgenographic and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  G E Gresham; U K Rathey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The association of abnormalities on physical examination of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  E Odding; H A Valkenburg; D Algra; F A Vandenouweland; D E Grobbee; A Hofman
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-09

8.  Knee pain and disability in the community.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; C Cooper; J R Kirwan; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1992-03

9.  Associations of radiological osteoarthritis of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  E Odding; H A Valkenburg; D Algra; F A Vandenouweland; D E Grobbee; A Hofman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Variation in rheumatologists' and family physicians' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  P C Coyte; G Hawker; R Croxford; C Attard; J G Wright
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  15 in total

1.  Population survey comparing older adults with hip versus knee pain in primary care.

Authors:  Louise Linsell; Jill Dawson; Krina Zondervan; Peter Rose; Andrew Carr; Tony Randall; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Disease severity and knee extensor force in knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Michael J Berger; Crystal O Kean; Aashish Goela; Timothy J Doherty
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Labelling chronic illness in primary care: a good or a bad thing?

Authors:  John Bedson; Rob McCarney; Peter Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  The attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of GPs regarding exercise for chronic knee pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cottrell; Edward Roddy; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Reliability of the jones patellofemoral osteoarthritis score for radiological assessment of patellofemoral degenerative changes: comparing a physiotherapist to doctors.

Authors:  T O Smith; S-N Kang; W B De Sprenger Rover; N P Walton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Variations among primary care physicians in exercise advice, imaging, and analgesics for musculoskeletal pain: results from a factorial experiment.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Michael A Fischer; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Jing Yu; Lisa D Marceau; John B McKinlay; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Can We Predict Severity of Osteoarthritis of Knees and Compartmental Involvement Based on a Set of Predefined Clinical Questions in Patients of Knee Pain?

Authors:  Alankar A Ramteke; Ketaki A Ramteke; Aviral C Meshram; Wasudeo M Gadegone; Dhananjay V Raje
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 8.  Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rubén E Mújica Mota; Rosanna Tarricone; Oriana Ciani; John F P Bridges; Mike Drummond
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature.

Authors:  John Bedson; Peter R Croft
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A cross sectional study of requests for knee radiographs from primary care.

Authors:  John Bedson; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.