Literature DB >> 12694775

Mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: is pericardial posterior annuloplasty a durable option?

Stefano Bevilacqua1, Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo, Jacopo Gianetti, Umberto Paradossi, Massimiliano Mariani, Sacha Matteucci, Enkel Kallushi, Mattia Glauber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biological and prosthetic rings are available for supporting mitral valve repair (MVR). Contrasting data are reported on the durability of pericardial ring annuloplasty. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the durability of MVR for degenerative regurgitation with posterior annuloplasty performed with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium.
METHODS: From August 1995 through December 2000, 133 patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative regurgitation (86 men, age 62.9+/-11.5 years). Thirty patients (22.6%) underwent combined coronary artery bypass graft and fourteen (10.5%) underwent tricuspid annuloplasty. Associated aortic disease, previous cardiac surgery and endocarditis were considered exclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (57.9%) received a Carpentier-Edwards ring and 56 received (42.1%) an autologous pericardium ring. Thirty-day mortality was 3.8%. Mean follow-up, 98.3% complete, was of 35.6+/-18.7 months. Five-year freedom from reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation> or =3+/4+ was significantly higher in the prosthetic ring group (90.1% - CL90%: 81.9-98.3%) compared with the pericardial ring group (62.6% - CL90%: 43.1-82.1%; P=0.027). Prosthetic ring implantation (P=0.004; RR=0.11) and preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class< or =II (P=0.011; RR=0.16) were independently related to a lower risk of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation> or =3+/4+, by multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival was 91.4% (CL90%: 87.9.7-95%). A higher preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P=0.006; RR=1.17) and the severity of associated coronary artery disease (P=0.021; RR=2.00) were independent predictive factors for poor survival by multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior pericardial annuloplasty can jeopardize reproducibility and durability of MVR for degenerative regurgitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694775     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00867-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

1.  Posterior mitral annuloplasty using autologous pericardium in the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse.

Authors:  Shiro Hazama; Kiyoyuki Eishi; Shiro Yamachika; Manabu Noguchi; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Hideaki Takai
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-10

2.  Use of the pericardial cord as a substitute for an infected mitral prosthetic ring associated with aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Matsuyama; Wataru Katou; Yuichi Ueda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-11

3.  Time-dependent change in fresh autologous pericardium applied for posterior mitral annuloplasty: degree of calcification and its influence on the repaired mitral valve.

Authors:  Takashi Miura; Kiyoyuki Eishi; Ichiro Sakamoto; Shiro Yamachika; Kouji Hashizume; Kentaro Yamane; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-08

4.  The viable mitral annular dynamics and left ventricular function after mitral valve repair by biological rings.

Authors:  Farideh Roshanali; Ali Vedadian; Saeed Shoar; Saleh Sandoughdaran; Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Hossein Mandegar
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2012-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.