Literature DB >> 12694525

The Hemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS): determinants of costs of care in persons with haemophilia A.

D R Globe1, W E Cunningham, R Andersen, S L Dietrich, R G Curtis, K L Parish, R T Miller, N L Sanders, G Kominski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to examine factors associated with utilization and costs for persons with haemophilia. STUDY
DESIGN: Utilization data and patient characteristics were collected through medical record review of 336 patients receiving treatment for at least 90% of their haemophilia care at one of five comprehensive haemophilia treatment centres in California. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The range of factor VIII deficiency in our sample was similar to the distribution among haemophilic patients in the Western United States; 215 (64%) had severe FVIII deficiency. The mean age in our sample was 21.4 (SD = 16.2) years old and 114 (34%) were HIV-positive. In the multivariate model predicting the total cost of health care during 1995 (adjusted R2 = 0.40), total annual costs were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with being HIV-seropositive, infusing FVIII concentrate through a port vs. i.v. infusion, the number of comorbidities, moderate arthropathy (compared with no arthropathy), mild arthropathy, history of inhibitor to FVIII, and current prophylactic FVIII concentrate infusion.
CONCLUSION: As expected, total health-care costs were correlated with comorbid medical conditions, such as HIV and sequelae of haemophilia such as arthropathy. Health policy should consider risk adjustment for the presence of complications such as arthropathy and HIV infection in the financing of haemophilia treatment to promote more equitable delivery of these services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694525     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00752.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  5 in total

1.  Rituximab for treatment of inhibitors in haemophilia A. A Phase II study.

Authors:  C Leissinger; C D Josephson; S Granger; B A Konkle; R Kruse-Jarres; M V Ragni; J M Journeycake; L Valentino; N S Key; J C Gill; K R McCrae; E J Neufeld; C Manno; L Raffini; K Saxena; M Torres; V Marder; C M Bennett; S F Assmann
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Haemophilia in the developing countries: the Iranian experience.

Authors:  Peyman Eshghi; Mitra Mahdavi-Mazdeh; Mehran Karimi; Mohammad Aghighi
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Assessment of healthcare measures, healthcare resource use, and cost of care among severe hemophilia A patients in Mumbai region of India.

Authors:  U Jadhav; K Mukherjee
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

4.  Inhibitor clinical burden of disease: a comparative analysis of the CHESS data.

Authors:  Abiola O Oladapo; Mei Lu; Shaun Walsh; Jamie O'Hara; Teresa L Kauf
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia.

Authors:  Kapil Saxena
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2013-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.