Literature DB >> 12691653

Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Brånemark System Wide-Platform TiUnite implants: an interim report of a prospective open-ended clinical multicenter study.

Roberto Calandriello1, Massimiliano Tomatis, Roberto Vallone, Bo Rangert, Jan Gottlow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First and second molars in the lower jaw are the most commonly missing teeth. As in other jaw regions with tooth loss, implant therapy is an attractive concept. Owing to the wide dimension of the molar teeth, wide implants seem to be a natural choice. However, wide implants in posterior mandibular regions sometimes present a problem. As an oxidized surface seems to facilitate implant integration and to result in a stronger fixation to bone, it was hypothesized that this surface would improve the performance of wide implants in posterior mandibles. As high initial stability most often is achieved in this region, it was hypothesized that the load per se is not a problem.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate immediate loading of Brånemark System TiUnite Wide-Platform implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) supporting single molar crowns in the lower jaw.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes 44 patients treated in three separate private dental offices between March 2001 and June 2002. A total of 50 implants were placed, and all implants have passed the 6-month follow-up; 24 have been followed up for 1 year. All implants were provided with provisional crowns in centric occlusion at the time of surgery.
RESULTS: No implant has been lost. Marginal bone levels were found in accordance with normal biologic width requirements. Resonance frequency analysis showed high and consistent implant stability. No biomechanical problems were found associated with the use of wide implants, and the potential physiologic problem in dense mandibular bone was eliminated.
CONCLUSION: Although limited by being a short-term study, the result encourages immediate loading of single Brånemark System TiUnite Wide-Platform implants placed in the molar regions in the lower jaw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12691653     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00018.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  7 in total

1.  Biomimetic treatment on dental implants for short-term bone regeneration.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Gil; Norberto Manzanares; Armando Badet; Conrado Aparicio; Maria-Pau Ginebra
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A short-term clinical study of marginal bone level change around microthreaded and platform-switched implants.

Authors:  Hee-Jung Yun; Jung-Chul Park; Jeong-Ho Yun; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Kyoo-Sung Cho
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Long-term follow-up of dental single implants under immediate orthodontic load.

Authors:  Lisiane Meira Palagi; Carlos Eduardo Sabrosa; Eveline C B Gava; Tiziano Baccetti; Jose Augusto M Miguel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants bioactivated with platelet-rich plasma placed in the mandibular posterior region: A clinico-radiographic study.

Authors:  Ullas Anand; D S Mehta
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-01

5.  Comparative evaluation of two types of immediately loaded implants using biomechanical and histomorphometric tests: an animal case study.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Bijan Movahedian; Navid Khalighinejad; Hamid Badrian; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Afsaneh Nekouie
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-07-18

6.  3D finite element analysis of immediate loading of single wide versus double implants for replacing mandibular molar.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Reetika Gaddale
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11

7.  FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods.

Authors:  M Cicciù; G Cervino; E Bramanti; F Lauritano; G Lo Gudice; L Scappaticci; A Rapparini; E Guglielmino; G Risitano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.238

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.