Literature DB >> 12691648

Immediate loading in the maxilla using flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations: a retrospective 3-year clinical study.

Antonio Rocci1, Massimiliano Martignoni, Jan Gottlow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate loading of dental implants shortens the treatment time and makes it possible to give the patient an esthetic appearance during the whole treatment period.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate an immediate-loading treatment protocol, which included flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions and connected to prefabricated provisional restorations, and the 3-year clinical results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 97 Brånemark System Mk IV implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) with a machined surface were inserted in the maxillas of 46 patients. A presurgical three-dimensional model of the patients' soft tissue and underlying alveolar bone anatomy was created, which allowed the clinician to place the implants in predetermined positions and connect them to prefabricated provisional restorations. A surgical template with drilling guides corresponding to each implant was used. The apical part of the master guide was equipped with a circular "mucotome," which punched out a 5 mm hole in the mucosa to eliminate the need for flap elevation. The patients received 25 fixed partial prostheses and 27 single-tooth restorations. Bone quality and quantity were assessed. Radiographic examinations were performed on the day of surgery/loading and at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up visits.
RESULTS: All implant sites showed intact buccal and lingual bone walls during surgery, confirming the accuracy of the bone-mapping procedure. The prefabricated temporary restorations fitted, meaning that the implants were positioned clinically in the same way as on the cast. Nine implants in eight patients failed during the first 8 weeks of loading. This resulted in a cumulative survival rate of 91% after 3 years of prosthetic load. The survival rate of splinted implants was 94%. The number of failed implants was significantly higher in cases of single-tooth replacements and placement in soft bone sites and smokers. The failed implants were successfully replaced according to a two-stage protocol. All patients finally received the expected restoration. The marginal bone resorption was on average 1.0 mm during the first year of loading, 0.4 mm during the second year, and 0.1 mm during the third year.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the feasibility of an immediate-loading treatment protocol in the maxilla, which included flapless surgery, implants and abutments placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations. All failures occurred within the first 2 months of loading. The unchanged survival rate and the low average bone loss found during the following 34-month study period indicate a good long-term prognosis for the performed immediate-loading treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12691648     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  21 in total

1.  Oral Implant Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Sarika Gupta; Neelkant Patil; Jitender Solanki; Ravinder Singh; Sanjeev Laller
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun

2.  CAD/CAM technologies in the surgical and prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient with biomymetic individualized approach.

Authors:  A Pozzi; M Gargari; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

3.  Aesthetic-functional rehabilitation through single restorations: immediate load.

Authors:  M Bonino; G DE Vico; C Baia; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-04-20

4.  Biomimetic treatment on dental implants for short-term bone regeneration.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Gil; Norberto Manzanares; Armando Badet; Conrado Aparicio; Maria-Pau Ginebra
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Piezosurgery-assisted, flapless split crest surgery for implant site preparation.

Authors:  Federico Brugnami; Alfonso Caiazzo; Pushkar Mehra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 6.  Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery.

Authors:  D P Laverty; J Buglass; A Patel
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Open flap versus flapless placement of dental implants. A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Enric Jané-Salas; Xavier Roselló-LLabrés; Enric Jané-Pallí; Siddharth Mishra; Raúl Ayuso-Montero; José López-López
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Comparative evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless techniques in the posterior edentulous areas of the mandible-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Divya Kumar; G Sivaram; B Shivakumar; Tss Kumar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-05

9.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative percussion diagnostics for determining implant stability.

Authors:  Lindsey R VanSchoiack; Veronica I Shubayev; Robert R Myers; Cherilyn G Sheets; James C Earthman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant-abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss.

Authors:  Chiung-Fang Wang; Heng-Li Huang; Dan-Jae Lin; Yen-Wen Shen; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.