Literature DB >> 12690496

Work-system risk factors for permanent work disability among home-care workers: a case-control study.

Lotta Dellve1, Monica Lagerström, Mats Hagberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing need for home-care services in western societies. As home-care workers show high levels of absence related to poor health it is important that we broaden our knowledge about what factors in the work system contribute to this. The aim of this study was to explore and estimate the impact of the work system on permanent work disability and its relative importance compared with home-life risks among home-care workers.
METHODS: The cases (617 subjects) were all home-care workers in Sweden, whose disability pension was approved in 1997 or 1998. The controls (771 subjects) were home-care workers still working. We used a questionnaire to gain situation-specific information on working life and home life 5 and 15 years before disability pension entitlement.
RESULTS: The most important risk factors in the work system were poor ergonomic/lifting conditions, time pressure and lack of professional caring technique. Fifteen years prior to disability pension entitlement, insufficient management (odds ratio (OR) 95%, CI 2.6[1.6;4.2]) and relational problems at work were also risk factors. Five years before disability pension entitlement, poor organisational support (4.1 [2.5;6.7]), opportunities for co-working and working climate (3.5 [2.4;5.2]) were also strongly related to a persisting work ability. The magnitude of exposure to a number of risk factors had an increased effect (highest 13.8 [5.6-33.8]). The strongest risk factor in home life was little opportunity to rest from work (4.9 [3.0;8.0]). The risk factors in working life were robust to the inclusion of the grouped risk factors of home life.
CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion was that risk factors related to the work system are, alone, strongly related to permanent work disability among home-care workers. Also, exposure to several of the risk factors constitutes a notably strong risk for permanent work disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12690496     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-002-0414-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of questionnaire-based information on previous physical work loads. Stockholm MUSIC 1 Study Group. Musculoskeletal Intervention Center.

Authors:  M Torgén; J Winkel; L Alfredsson; A Kilbom
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures.

Authors:  K Teschke; J C Smith; A F Olshan
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Work load and individual factors affecting work ability among aging municipal employees.

Authors:  K Tuomi; L Eskelinen; J Toikkanen; E Jarvinen; J Ilmarinen; M Klockars
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Psychosocial work factors, physical work load and associated musculoskeletal symptoms among home care workers.

Authors:  J A Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1995-06

Review 5.  Psychosocial work environment in human service organizations: a conceptual analysis and development of the demand-control model.

Authors:  B Söderfeldt; M Söderfeldt; C Muntaner; P O'Campo; L E Warg; C G Ohlson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Dialectic between conceptual and causal inquiry in psychosocial work-environment research.

Authors:  J V Johnson; E M Hall
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-10

7.  Domestic labour, paid employment and women's health: analysis of life course data.

Authors:  D Blane; L Berney; S M Montgomery
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Cross-sectional study of risk factors for symptoms in the neck and shoulder area.

Authors:  K Ekberg; M Karlsson; O Axelson; P Malm
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism.

Authors:  G Aronsson; K Gustafsson; M Dallner
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Reports of work related musculoskeletal injury among home care service workers compared with nursery school workers and the general population of employed women in Sweden.

Authors:  Y Ono; M Lagerström; M Hagberg; A Lindén; B Malker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  20 in total

1.  Does leadership support buffer the effect of workplace bullying on the risk of disability pensioning? An analysis of register-based outcomes using pooled survey data from 24,538 employees.

Authors:  Thomas Clausen; Paul Maurice Conway; Hermann Burr; Tage S Kristensen; Åse Marie Hansen; Anne Helene Garde; Annie Hogh
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Rehabilitation of home care workers: supportive factors and obstacles prior to disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Lotta Dellve; Monica Lagerström; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-06

3.  Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.

Authors:  Catherine E Tong; Joanie Sims-Gould; Anne Martin-Matthews
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  The greatest risk for low-back pain among newly educated female health care workers; body weight or physical work load?

Authors:  Jette Nygaard Jensen; Andreas Holtermann; Thomas Clausen; Ole Steen Mortensen; Isabella Gomes Carneiro; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Differences in risk factors for voluntary early retirement and disability pension: a 15-year follow-up in a cohort of nurses' aides.

Authors:  Lone Donbæk Jensen; Pia Køhler Ryom; Michael Victor Christensen; Johan Hviid Andersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Work related complaints of neck, shoulder and arm among computer office workers: a cross-sectional evaluation of prevalence and risk factors in a developing country.

Authors:  Priyanga Ranasinghe; Yashasvi S Perera; Dilusha A Lamabadusuriya; Supun Kulatunga; Naveen Jayawardana; Senaka Rajapakse; Prasad Katulanda
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Work related risk factors for neck, shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among Dutch computer office workers.

Authors:  Shahla Eltayeb; J Bart Staal; Amar Hassan; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-12

8.  The predictive effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on low back pain among newly qualified health care workers with and without previous low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jette Nygaard Jensen; Karen Albertsen; Vilhelm Borg; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  [Prevalence of cervicalgia and pain in the upper limbs of computer users in the workplace in Casablanca (Morocco)].

Authors:  Nawal Seknaji; Wafaa Rachidi; Samira Hassoune; Saadia Janani; Samira Nani; Abderrahmane Maaroufi; Ouafaa Mkinsi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2013-04-24

10.  Self-reported work ability of Norwegian women in relation to physical and mental health, and to the work environment.

Authors:  Migle Gamperiene; Jan F Nygård; Inger Sandanger; Bjørn Lau; Dag Bruusgaard
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.