Literature DB >> 10982978

Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures.

K Teschke1, J C Smith, A F Olshan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recall bias remains a concern in case-control studies, although few investigations have found evidence of differential recall. This study examined whether differences in occupational exposure reporting occur in volunteered vs. prompted questionnaire responses.
METHODS: In a large, population-based, case-control study of a childhood cancer, neuroblastoma, we calculated odds ratios for broad occupational exposure groups on the assumption that in the absence of recall bias, risk estimates for such broad groupings should be close to the null value.
RESULTS: Prompted exposures and work activities showed little evidence of differential recall by parents of cases and controls (all OR < 1.2), but case parents were more likely to volunteer information about other exposures or activities (ORs: 1.35-1.71). Case mothers were also more likely than control mothers to report activities involving indirect exposure (OR = 1.41).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that prompted exposure questions are less likely to be subject to recall bias than open-ended questions. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982978     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0274(200010)38:4<385::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  18 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K Teschke; A F Olshan; J L Daniels; A J De Roos; C G Parks; M Schulz; T L Vaughan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Work-system risk factors for permanent work disability among home-care workers: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lotta Dellve; Monica Lagerström; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Exposure to vapors, gas, dust, or fumes: assessment by a single survey item compared to a detailed exposure battery and a job exposure matrix.

Authors:  Paul D Blanc; Mark D Eisner; John R Balmes; Laura Trupin; Edward H Yelin; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Use and Reliability of Exposure Assessment Methods in Occupational Case-Control Studies in the General Population: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Calvin B Ge; Melissa C Friesen; Hans Kromhout; Susan Peters; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Association of dietary quercetin with reduced risk of proximal colon cancer.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Richard K Severson; Ikuko Kato
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.900

6.  Dietary fatty acids, luminal modifiers, and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ikuko Kato; Adhip P Majumdar; Susan J Land; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Richard K Severson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Functional polymorphisms to modulate luminal lipid exposure and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ikuko Kato; Susan Land; Adhip P Majumdar; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Richard K Severson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  OccIDEAS: retrospective occupational exposure assessment in community-based studies made easier.

Authors:  Lin Fritschi; Melissa C Friesen; Deborah Glass; Geza Benke; Jennifer Girschik; Troy Sadkowsky
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15

9.  Parental military service, agent orange exposure, and the risk of rhabdomyosarcoma in offspring.

Authors:  Seymour Grufferman; Philip J Lupo; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Heather E Danysh; Erik B Erhardt; Simona Ognjanovic
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Risk factors for respiratory work disability in a cohort of pulp mill workers exposed to irritant gases.

Authors:  Nicola Murgia; Kjell Torén; Jeong-Lim Kim; Eva Andersson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.