Literature DB >> 12690478

Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer?

Hiroshi Shimada1, Itaru Endo, Mitsutaka Sugita, Hideki Masunari, Yoshiro Fujii, Kuniya Tanaka, Hitoshi Sekido, Shinji Togo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The essential minimum of hepatic segmentectomy combined with caudate lobectomy (parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy) has been recommended particularly for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer to minimize the risk of postoperative liver failure. This quality control study investigated whether parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy is a "noble option" in the surgical treatment of hilar bile duct cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients with hilar bile duct cancer underwent surgical resection. These patients were retrospectively classified into a major hepatectomy group (major Hx, n=30), a parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group (preserving Hx, n=11), and a hilar bile duct resection group (HBDR, n=12). A preserving Hx consisted of caudate lobectomy, either alone (n=3), or combined with resection of segment 4 (S4, n=4), or S58 (n=3) or S458 (n=1). The preserving Hx was used for high-risk patients in whom tumor tissue was diagnosed to be Bismuth type I and II by preoperative selective percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.
RESULTS: The mean numbers of hepatico-jejunostomies were 2.8, 4.8, and 4.6 in the respective groups. Mortality rates including hospital death were 13.3%, 0%, and 0% respectively. Morbidity rates were 46.7%, 54.5%, and 33.3%. The preserving Hx group encountered no liver failure (T.Bil>10 mg/dl, encephalopathy) but acquired hyperbilirubinemia (T.Bil>5 mg/dl), pulmonary insufficiency and other complications at the same frequency as in the major Hx group. The survival rates in the three groups were 35.6%, 52.5%, and 48.6% at 3 years and 25.2%, 14.9%, and 24.3% at 5 years respectively. Curability rates (R0 to R1+2) were 76.7%, 54.5% and 50.0%, respectively. Preserving Hx tended to result in higher frequencies of positive transmural margins (e.g., cancer cells remaining around the right hepatic artery or the portal vein).
CONCLUSIONS: Preserving hepatectomy for high-risk patients should be limited strictly to patients who do not have tumors which are not invading adjacent organs (e.g., T2) nor a segmental duct and are confined longitudinally to the right or the left.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12690478     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-003-0358-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma--a single center experience.

Authors:  M F Gerhards; T M van Gulik; L T de Wit; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Aggressive surgical approaches to hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatic or local resection?

Authors:  M Miyazaki; H Ito; K Nakagawa; S Ambiru; H Shimizu; Y Shimizu; A Kato; S Nakamura; H Omoto; N Nakajima; F Kimura; T Suwa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Segments I and IV resection as a new approach for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Miyazaki; H Ito; K Nakagawa; S Ambiru; H Shimizu; Y Shimizu; A Okuno; S Nozawa; Y Nukui; H Yoshitomi; N Nakajima
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Ultrasonically guided percutaneous transhepatic bile drainage: a single-step procedure without cholangiography.

Authors:  M Makuuchi; Y Bandai; T Ito; G Watanabe; T Wada; H Abe; T Muroi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection.

Authors:  T Kosuge; J Yamamoto; K Shimada; S Yamasaki; M Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer.

Authors:  S G Lee; Y J Lee; K M Park; S Hwang; P C Min
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2000

7.  Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience.

Authors:  Y Nimura; J Kamiya; S Kondo; M Nagino; K Uesaka; K Oda; T Sano; H Yamamoto; N Hayakawa
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2000

8.  The infiltration of bile duct carcinoma along the bile duct wall.

Authors:  H Shimada; S Niimoto; A Matsuba; G Nakagawara; M Kobayashi; S Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1988 Apr-Jun

9.  Staging of biliary carcinoma: cholangiography and cholangioscopy.

Authors:  Y Nimura
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

Authors:  E C Burke; W R Jarnagin; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Isolated caudate lobectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for a bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sano; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yoshiki Senda; Koji Komori; Seiji Ito; Tetsuya Abe; Taira Kinoshita; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  [Surgical therapy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  H Lang; G M Kaiser; T Zöpf; G C Sotiropoulos; A Frilling; M Malagó; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Retroportal hepaticojejunostomy for extended resection of hilar bile ducts.

Authors:  Itaru Endo; Mitsutaka Sugita; Hideki Masunari; Kenichi Yoshida; Kazuhisa Takeda; Hitoshi Sekido; Shinji Togo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgical outcome of hilar plate resection: extended hilar bile duct resection without hepatectomy.

Authors:  Takehiro Noji; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Eiichi Tanaka; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure.

Authors:  Shuai Xiang; Wan Yee Lau; Xiao-ping Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.