J A Cassell1, M G Brook, C H Mercer, S Murphy, A M Johnson. 1. Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Mortimer Market Centre, Off Capper Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore patterns of primary care attendance, barriers to the use of primary care, and views on services in a population of first time genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic attenders. METHOD: A cross sectional survey of new patients attending a mainly walk-in outer London GUM clinic, in which responses were linked to clinical data. RESULTS: 40.5% of all patients and 39.9% of those with an STI had already seen a GP for their current problem. This did not vary with age or symptom status. Duration of symptoms was highly significantly longer in patients who had attended a GP than in patients who attended a GUM clinic in the first instance. When patients who had not seen a GP were asked the reason for this, a third of responses cited the convenience of a GUM clinic or difficulty in accessing primary care services, while only 3% cited embarrassment and only 2% examination or gender issues. CONCLUSION: Many patients initially attend GP services for STIs, and primary care is therefore already an important setting with potential for STI control. However, delay in treatment through attendance at primary care, and barriers in access to primary care, need to be addressed in the planning of future services.
OBJECTIVES: To explore patterns of primary care attendance, barriers to the use of primary care, and views on services in a population of first time genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic attenders. METHOD: A cross sectional survey of new patients attending a mainly walk-in outer London GUM clinic, in which responses were linked to clinical data. RESULTS: 40.5% of all patients and 39.9% of those with an STI had already seen a GP for their current problem. This did not vary with age or symptom status. Duration of symptoms was highly significantly longer in patients who had attended a GP than in patients who attended a GUM clinic in the first instance. When patients who had not seen a GP were asked the reason for this, a third of responses cited the convenience of a GUM clinic or difficulty in accessing primary care services, while only 3% cited embarrassment and only 2% examination or gender issues. CONCLUSION: Many patients initially attend GP services for STIs, and primary care is therefore already an important setting with potential for STI control. However, delay in treatment through attendance at primary care, and barriers in access to primary care, need to be addressed in the planning of future services.
Authors: J Melville; S Sniffen; R Crosby; L Salazar; W Whittington; D Dithmer-Schreck; R DiClemente; A Wald Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Carrie Llewellyn; Alex Pollard; Alec Miners; Daniel Richardson; Martin Fisher; John Cairns; Helen Smith Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Ruthie Birger; John Saunders; Claudia Estcourt; Andrew John Sutton; Catherine H Mercer; Tracy Roberts; Peter J White Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Catherine H Mercer; Lorna Sutcliffe; Anne M Johnson; Peter J White; Gary Brook; Jonathan D C Ross; Jyoti Dhar; Paddy Horner; Frances Keane; Eva Jungmann; John Sweeney; George Kinghorn; Geoff G Garnett; Judith M Stephenson; Jackie A Cassell Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 3.519