Literature DB >> 12689728

Prokaryote and eukaryote evolvability.

Anthony M Poole1, Matthew J Phillips, David Penny.   

Abstract

The concept of evolvability covers a broad spectrum of, often contradictory, ideas. At one end of the spectrum it is equivalent to the statement that evolution is possible, at the other end are untestable post hoc explanations, such as the suggestion that current evolutionary theory cannot explain the evolution of evolvability. We examine similarities and differences in eukaryote and prokaryote evolvability, and look for explanations that are compatible with a wide range of observations. Differences in genome organisation between eukaryotes and prokaryotes meets this criterion. The single origin of replication in prokaryote chromosomes (versus multiple origins in eukaryotes) accounts for many differences because the time to replicate a prokaryote genome limits its size (and the accumulation of junk DNA). Both prokaryotes and eukaryotes appear to switch from genetic stability to genetic change in response to stress. We examine a range of stress responses, and discuss how these impact on evolvability, particularly in unicellular organisms versus complex multicellular ones. Evolvability is also limited by environmental interactions (including competition) and we describe a model that places limits on potential evolvability. Examples are given of its application to predator competition and limits to lateral gene transfer. We suggest that unicellular organisms evolve largely through a process of metabolic change, resulting in biochemical diversity. Multicellular organisms evolve largely through morphological changes, not through extensive changes to cellular biochemistry.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12689728     DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2647(02)00131-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  21 in total

1.  The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes.

Authors:  David Penny; Lesley J Collins; Toni K Daly; Simon J Cox
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A model for genome size evolution.

Authors:  Stephan Fischer; Samuel Bernard; Guillaume Beslon; Carole Knibbe
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Staphylococcus aureus helicase but not Escherichia coli helicase stimulates S. aureus primase activity and maintains initiation specificity.

Authors:  Scott A Koepsell; Marilynn A Larson; Mark A Griep; Steven H Hinrichs
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. V. Insight into the niche specialist fuzzy spreader compels revision of the model Pseudomonas radiation.

Authors:  Gayle C Ferguson; Frederic Bertels; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Parallel genetic changes and nonparallel gene-environment interactions characterize the evolution of drug resistance in yeast.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Dara S Lo; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Evolution of microbes and viruses: a paradigm shift in evolutionary biology?

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Yuri I Wolf
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  A Short-Term Advantage for Syngamy in the Origin of Eukaryotic Sex: Effects of Cell Fusion on Cell Cycle Duration and Other Effects Related to the Duration of the Cell Cycle-Relationship between Cell Growth Curve and the Optimal Size of the Species, and Circadian Cell Cycle in Photosynthetic Unicellular Organisms.

Authors:  J M Mancebo Quintana; S Mancebo Quintana
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-05-14

8.  The emergence of predators in early life: there was no Garden of Eden.

Authors:  Silvester de Nooijer; Barbara R Holland; David Penny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evolutionary constraints permeate large metabolic networks.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A systems approach defining constraints of the genome architecture on lineage selection and evolvability during somatic cancer evolution.

Authors:  Albert Rübben; Ole Nordhoff
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.