Literature DB >> 12687718

Development of a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) maxillofacial prosthetic material.

Tariq Aziz1, Mark Waters, Robert Jagger.   

Abstract

Maxillofacial prosthetic materials are used to rehabilitate patients suffering from acquired or congenital facial disfigurement. Silicone rubber materials [poly(dimethylsiloxane) rubbers] are the materials of choice. However, current formulations have inadequate mechanical properties, in particular, tear strength. The purpose of this study was to formulate a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) material with improved mechanical properties in comparison to commercially available materials. The formulations developed were based on condensation chemistry containing a hydroxy-end-blocked poly(dimethylsiloxane), hydrophobic silica filler, silane cross-linking agents, and a tin catalyst. The following parameters were varied in order to formulate improved materials: (a) bimodal polymeric mix (i.e., ratio of high- and low-molecular-weight polymers); (b) silica filler type and quantity. By varying these parameters a formulation was developed with a base polymer mix of 80%:20% high- to low-molecular-weight polymers into which 20% w/w filler was added. This formulation had a tear strength of 22.23 +/- 1.6 m N/mm compared to the commercial materials having tear strengths in the range 4.53-17.63 N/mm. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 252-261, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687718     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  7 in total

Review 1.  Maxillofacial prosthetic materials- an inclination towards silicones.

Authors:  Aparajita Mitra; Sunita Choudhary; Hemlata Garg; Jagadeesh H G
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

2.  Effect of intrinsic pigmentation on the tear strength and water sorption of two commercially available silicone elastomers.

Authors:  Sajni Y Rai; Satyabodh S Guttal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-09-28

3.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Evaluation of Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicones: the effect of dark storage and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pınar Çevik
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2018-05-01

5.  Effect of nano-titanium oxide addition on some mechanical properties of silicone elastomers for maxillofacial prostheses.

Authors:  Dhuha A Shakir; Faiza M Abdul-Ameer
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Alejandro Alonso-Calleja; Alexander Kelly; Cambre Kelly; Ken Gall; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Effect of the simulated Indian and Mediterranean climates on the Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicone.

Authors:  Amanda Ferreira; Meena Aras; Vidya Chitre; Ivy Coutinho; Praveen Rajagopal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.