Literature DB >> 21769310

Adding Subjects or Adding Measurements in Repeated Measurement Studies Under Financial Constraints.

Song Zhang1, Chul Ahn.   

Abstract

Budget constraint is a challenge faced by investigators in planning almost every clinical trial. For a repeated measurement study, investigators need to decide whether to increase the number of participating subjects or to increase the number of repeated measurements per subject, with the ultimate goal of maximizing power for a given financial constraint. This financially constrained design problem is further complicated when taking into account things such as missing data and various correlation structures among the repeated measurements. We propose an approach that combines a GEE estimator of slope coefficients with the cost constraint. In the case where we have no missing data and the compound symmetric correlation structure, the optimal design is derived analytically. In the case where we have missing data or other correlation structures, the optimal design is identified through numerical search. We present an extensive simulation study to explore the impacts of cost ratio, missing pattern, dropout rate, and correlation structure. We also present an application example.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769310      PMCID: PMC3137383          DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2010.10022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res        ISSN: 1946-6315            Impact factor:   1.452


  14 in total

1.  Sample size for biomarker studies: more subjects or more measurements per subject?

Authors:  Dejian Lai; Terri M King; Lemuel A Moyé; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Adding subjects or adding measurements: Which increases the precision of longitudinal research?

Authors:  S Arndt; R Jorge; C Turvey; R G Robinson
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Optimal number of repeated measures and group sizes in clinical trials with linearly divergent treatment effects.

Authors:  Bjorn Winkens; Hubert J A Schouten; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Martijn P F Berger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Sample size requirement for repeated measurements in continuous data.

Authors:  K J Lui; W G Cumberland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Semi-parametric and non-parametric methods for the analysis of repeated measurements with applications to clinical trials.

Authors:  C S Davis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Linearly divergent treatment effects in clinical trials with repeated measures: efficient analysis using summary statistics.

Authors:  L J Frison; S J Pocock
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  R I Jennrich; M D Schluchter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Sample size requirements and the cost of a randomized clinical trial with repeated measurements.

Authors:  D A Bloch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Estimating sample sizes for repeated measurement designs.

Authors:  J E Overall; S R Doyle
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1994-04

10.  Effects of correlation and missing data on sample size estimation in longitudinal clinical trials.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.894

View more
  3 in total

1.  A discrete-time survival model with random effects for designing and analyzing repeated low-dose challenge experiments.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Ying Huang; Christopher J Miller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Optimal combination of number of participants and number of repeated measurements in longitudinal studies with time-varying exposure.

Authors:  Jose Barrera-Gómez; Donna Spiegelman; Xavier Basagaña
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  How many measurements for time-averaged differences in repeated measurement studies?

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.