Laboratory assessment of immune function in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Advances in immunosuppression have made renal transplantation an effective therapy for end stage renal failure; with low rejection rates and long graft survival times. However, the major adverse consequences, infection and malignancy have not diminished. To predict this risk a score of immune competence has been developed from the simultaneous laboratory assessment of multiple parameters of immune function.
METHODS: The immune status of 152 transplant recipients (138 renal and 14 pancreas/renal) was assessed by measurement of lymphocyte subsets, mitogen-induced T-cell proliferative responses, neutrophil phagocytic capacity and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. A scoring system was devised based on the average number of these parameters below 10th percentile of normal.
RESULTS: The most common abnormality was B-cell lymphopenia (85%) followed by reduced neutrophil ROS production (63% of patients), NK cell lymphopenia (50%), lymphocyte mitogen response (49%) and CD4 number (23%). The abnormalities were unrelated to the duration of immunosuppression (up to 15 years), and variable combinations of cyclosporine A, azathioprine, prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (except for a consistent reduction in lymphocyte mitogen response in MMF treated patients). Retrospective comparison of infective episodes showed a significantly greater index of infections in patients with the worst score compared with a normal score.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggests that this quantification of immune function may allow assessment of the level of host immune defence reflecting the level of drug-induced immunosuppression and thus risks of immunosuppressive complications.