| Literature DB >> 28554920 |
Patrick James Highton1,2, Jill Neale2, Thomas J Wilkinson2, Nicolette C Bishop1,2, Alice C Smith1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) display increased infection-related mortality and elevated cardiovascular risk only partly attributed to traditional risk factors. Patients with CKD also exhibit a pro-inflammatory environment and impaired immune function. Aerobic exercise has the potential to positively impact these detriments, but is under-researched in this patient population. This feasibility study will investigate the effects of acute aerobic exercise on inflammation and immune function in patients with CKD to inform the design of larger studies intended to ultimately influence current exercise recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with CKD, including renal transplant recipients, will visit the laboratory on two occasions, both preceded by appropriate exercise, alcohol and caffeine restrictions. On visit 1, baseline assessments will be completed, comprising anthropometrics, body composition, cardiovascular function and fatigue and leisure time exercise questionnaires. Participants will then undertake an incremental shuttle walk test to estimate predicted peak O2 consumption (VO2peak). On visit 2, participants will complete a 20 min shuttle walk at a constant speed to achieve 85% estimated VO2peak. Blood and saliva samples will be taken before, immediately after and 1 hour after this exercise bout. Muscle O2 saturation will be monitored throughout exercise and recovery. Age and sex-matched non-CKD 'healthy control' participants will complete an identical protocol. Blood and saliva samples will be analysed for markers of inflammation and immune function, using cytometric bead array and flow cytometry techniques. Appropriate statistical tests will be used to analyse the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was granted by the East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee on 18 September 2015 (ref 15/EM/0391), and the study was approved and sponsored by University Hospitals of Leicester Research and Innovation (ref 11444). The study was registered with ISRCTN (ref 38935454). The results will be presented at relevant conferences, and it is anticipated that the reports will be published in appropriate journals in 2018. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.Entities:
Keywords: exercise; immunology; inflammation; nephrology; renal transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28554920 PMCID: PMC5729975 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Established chronic kidney disease (all stages will be eligible including those with an established kidney transplant and those receiving dialysis treatment) | Age under 18 years Pregnancy Received kidney transplant less than 6 months prior to study entry Any element of study assessment protocol considered by principle care provider to be contraindicated due to physical impairment, comorbidity or any other reason Inability to give informed consent for any reason Visual or hearing impairment or insufficient command of English to give informed consent or comply with the assessment protocol |
Figure 1Visit 2 exercise and sample collection protocol. ↓, venous blood and saliva collection. ESWT, Endurance Shuttle Walk Test.
Figure 2Demonstration of the gating strategy used to identify immune cell subsets. (A) Total monocyte gating. (B) Monocyte subsets (R3 = classical (CD14++CD16-), R4 = intermediate (CD14++CD16+), R5 = non-classical (CD14+CD16++) (R1 and R2 were used as preliminary gating to remove neutrophils). (C) Total lymphocyte gating. (D) Gating CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the upper right quadrant. (E) Gating CD4+ helper T lymphocytes in the upper right quadrant. (F) Gating B lymphocytes (CD3-CD19+) in the upper left quadrant. (G) Initial T-Reg gating, identifying CD4+ lymphocytes. (H) Secondary T-reg gating, back-gated onto plot G, further identifying the CD4+ lymphocytes that are CD25+CD127-. Not all graphs display 100% of acquired cells—this has been altered independently to allow ease of gating.
Figure 3Demonstration of the gating strategy used to characterise microparticles. (A) ‘All microparticles’ set using beads of known size. (B) ‘All microparticles’ based on Annexin-v expression. (C) Phenotype marker expression, used to quantify microparticles of different cellular sources. (D) Prothrombotic potential, assessed by Tissue Factor expression. All gates have been appropriately sized and positioned using unstained samples to distinguish negative versus positive staining. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; F/SSC-H, Forward/Side Scatter-Height; PE phycoerythrin.